Talk:Play Magnus (mobile app)

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 April 2017. The result of the discussion was WP:SNOW keep.

Chess Low‑importance

	Chess portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChessWikipedia:WikiProject ChessTemplate:WikiProject Chesschess articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Mobile app

Is the word "app" even considered colloquial anymore? MaxBrowne (talk) 15:42, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming in response to my edit, I definitely would say "app" is informal. But I don't have strong feelings on it. -- ferret (talk) 15:45, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

@IQ125 and Codename Lisa: Please stop edit warring and instead discuss here - in nice full sentences - the infobox changes and where you think the image should be placed. Sam Walton (talk) 10:30, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT CHANGE ARTICLE WHILE IT IS UNDER A DELETION +TAG. IQ125 (talk) 10:32, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no rule against editing an article that you or anyone else has placed a deletion tag on. Sam Walton (talk) 10:34, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is considered bad form to do so. IQ125 (talk) 10:50, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Samwalton9: Okay, this time I won't touch the infobox which has proven to be disputed. —Codename Lisa (talk) 11:31, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]