Jump to content

Talk:Pratt & Whitney Canada

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fine

[edit]

I think something about Pratt & Whitney Canada's US fine for selling technology to China. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/pratt-whitney-canada-pleads-guilty-in-military-software-case/article4377357/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattclare (talkcontribs) 01:14, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1974 United Aircraft strike

[edit]

I think that this defining moment in the company history should not be ignored, it literally made PWC into the fantastic company it is today. This article as it is, is barely a product list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.212.9.246 (talk) 07:22, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Pratt & Whitney Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:20, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Next Generation Regional Turboprop

[edit]

I have moved the section "Next Generation Regional Turboprop" from Pratt & Whitney Canada PW100, because this is a new family of engines, not part of the PW100 family.

However, it's my opinion that this warrants at most a single sentence, because this engine does not yet exist. It is still in the design stage. I was going to suggest taking it out entirely, but there does seem to be enough coverage in reliable sources to indicate notability. Kendall-K1 (talk) 16:48, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It still needs to be a single sentence, but we can keep all the refs. I'd recommend a draft article for the details. BilCat (talk) 08:54, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]