Talk:Prigg v. Pennsylvania

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Kidnapping of free blacks[edit]

The court in this decision refused to even consider the problem of the kidnapping of free blacks into slavery (see Twelve Years a Slave etc.), setting a precedent for later decisions and laws which also did nothing to solve this problem. See Slavery Law and Politics: The Dred Scott Case in Historical Perspective by Don E. Fehrenbacher. p. 23. AnonMoos (talk) 23:42, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

The Liberty Party platform of 1843 (adopted in advance of the 1844 presidential election) contains several negative references to Prigg v. Pennsylvania... AnonMoos (talk) 14:59, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Problem with Statement of the Holding[edit]

The statement of the holding and the discussion omits one of the most important issues in the case, whether Congress had power to enact the Fugitive Slave Act. I would propose to edit to the holding statement and then add discussion. Lawrence Solum. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.218.0.79 (talk) 13:03, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

"further weakened the Fugitive Slave Act of 1793"[edit]

This is not an adequate summary of the main effect of the decision. It weakened the particular enforcement mechanisms of the 1793 law, but pointed the way to much more stringent laws which could be passed in future (as happened in 1850). Furthermore, by refusing to take any judicial notice of the problem of kidnapping of free blacks, it prepared the way for much nefarious skullduggery with its implicit message that blacks were entitled to fewer safeguards than whites. I really don't see how it could reasonably be considered any advance in the "history of American civil rights"... AnonMoos (talk) 14:59, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Prigg v. Pennsylvania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:35, 25 December 2017 (UTC)