Talk:Queen's Theatre, Long Acre

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Queen's Theatre, Long Acre article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from Queen's Theatre, Long Acre appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 April 2008, and was viewed approximately 718 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in 1877 the 4,000-seat Queen's Theatre staged a spectacular and expensive production of The Last Days of Pompeii that flopped: the earth did not quake, the volcano did not erupt, and acrobats fell onto the cast?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/April.

Wikipedia

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Queen's Theatre, Long Acre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110707060227/http://www.gabrielleray.150m.com/ArchiveTextH/HenriettaHodson.html to http://www.gabrielleray.150m.com/ArchiveTextH/HenriettaHodson.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:02, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinate error

{{geodata-check}} A coordinate fix is needed for the historical Queen's Theatre. The coordinates offered make it coextensive with the Covent Garden tube station, whereas an 1868 map clearly shows it as being located on the other side of Long Acre and somewhat to the northeast, across what is now Endell Street. —92.234.212.163 (talk) 09:10, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What are the correct coordinates? -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:39, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done per this 1874 map. Thanks for pointing out the error. Deor (talk) 17:24, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on Hodson and Labouchère marriage.

"By 1868, Hodson and Labouchère were living together out of wedlock, as they could not marry until her first husband finally died in 1887." A more accurate sentence would be "By 1868, Hodson and Labouchère were living together out of wedlock, and they did not marry until her first husband died in 1887."

In fact Henrietta's first husband Richard Walter Pigeon filed for divorce on 12 August 1869 on the grounds of Hodson and Labouchère's adultery(petition available on ancestry https://www.ancestry.com.au/sharing/2743921?mark=dc16f3c3c8bde60a6829aae0da004bea9344a4d912248c2ff4d39154201e0d8a). The case does not seem to have been resolved as the co-respondent Labouchère did not file a submission although he was given a 3 week ultimatum to do so. Meanwhile the judge awarded temporary custody of the child from Henrietta's first marriage to Richard Walter Pigeon. Henrietta was allowed to see the boy for 3 hours once a fortnight.Interesting that in the 1871 census Henrietta is living with Labouchère but her occupation is listed as concubine! I wonder who filled in the census?

All this detail probably not relevant hence small change to sentence above. Redilion (talk) 01:36, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the divorce was not resolved, they could not marry, and the sentence is correct as is. User:Tim riley please comment. -- Ssilvers (talk) 04:35, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Both wordings are factually correct. I don't see any advantage in the change. Tim riley talk 07:37, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]