Talk:Queenie (Blackadder)
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Queenie (Blackadder) redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 21:11, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
– This Blackadder character is not easily recognizable by base title alone. Stats of Blackadder character (this month and last 90 days) can prove that it is more popular than the novel, the miniseries, and the elephant. But I'm not convinced that this fictional character is more significant than Queenie (name) or the elephant from long ago. George Ho (talk) 20:41, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support - per nom, good call George. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:22, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- The word "Queenie" has many meanings. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:22, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- You mean "support", right? George Ho (talk) 15:40, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support. Nowhere near a primary usage. The name "Queenie" is common enough, as can be seen on the disambig page. JIP | Talk 10:15, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.