This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.
If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
There's some pretty sketchy and un-encyclopaedic info happening here. Language v. informal, with a definite whiff of some dog-whistle stuff going on.
But whatever, someone is probably just going to come along and delete the tag, and this talk page, and make it even worse. I would imagine some "supporters of free speech" might consider this tag as unfairly impinging upon their rights. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 14:22, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
I've reverted the non-neutral edits, as they were blatantly in violation of WP:NPOV. Robofish (talk) 18:26, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
It still needs some help in the Independent Media Inquiry section. Cvsoft (talk) 03:00, 5 August 2012 (UTC)