Talk:Rickrolling
This article was nominated for deletion on 1 April 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rickrolling article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 100 days |
Rickrolling was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 2008-09-16, Rickrolling was linked from Digg, a high-traffic website. (Traffic) All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Rickrolling, Rick Astley, or the "Never Gonna Give You Up" song. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Rickrolling, Rick Astley, or the "Never Gonna Give You Up" song at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
On 24 March 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Rickroll. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Requested move 24 March 2024[edit]
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – Hilst [talk]
13:50, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Rickrolling → Rickroll – Why is the title is the present tense? Coddlebean (talk) 09:47, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - Its about the act, not an instance, so WP:GERUND with -ing is appropriate and commonly-used. -- Netoholic @ 11:37, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Strong oppose. This is about the act of rickrolling. O.N.R. (talk) 16:55, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. And rickroll would actually be the present tense! -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:01, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:GERUND per above. Like, for example, while we COULD technically use the noun version ("a rickroll"), the current title is using the verb version (as in "to rickroll someone") — and because we're using the verb as the title, it should follow WP:GERUND. Paintspot Infez (talk) 03:29, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose why use the verb form when the WP:GERUND form is being used. A wikt:en:gerund is a noun. "To rickroll" verb form, WP:VERB we don't use verb forms in titles, since you seem to propose moving it to the verb form -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 08:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Youtube URL structure[edit]
It might be worth noting that Rickrolling is only possible because Youtube is using a simple, outdated URL structure with just a random ID number as parameter, with no indication for the content of the page in the URL itself, as most websites today use. If the link URL were something like youtube.com/rick-astley-never-gonna-give-you-up.html, nobody could be fooled. 78.55.129.159 (talk) 20:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC) Hans
Rickroll (CHANGE REQUEST IF UNDER 1,600,000,000 VIEWS)[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change '1.5' to 'under 1.6' 70.22.248.187 (talk) 22:40, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Not done: "Under 1.6" is too vague to be useful; the current text, "over 1.5", is preferable. —C.Fred (talk) 22:46, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
revert[edit]
@C.Fred: I realized that you reverted my edit, and I reflect that maybe my edit summary was a bit naive :'). I was simply deleting the part mentioning that the video has garnered 1.5B+ views on Youtube because that was already mentioned in the very beginning. I hope you understand and reconsider your revert.
Pingy/Pongy 02:31, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Rick Astley losing popularity[edit]
Rickrolls died down around 2021-2024. A lot of games show photos of Rick Astley , leading to a climax of approximately 10 million ditches at 5:00 on the fifteenth of June in 2024. 103.100.225.238 (talk) 08:56, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- And what does this mean exactly? SuperWikiBrother (talk) 10:23, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
"We're no strangers to love" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
The redirect We're no strangers to love has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 2 § We're no strangers to love until a consensus is reached. cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:20, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delisted good articles
- Articles linked from high traffic sites
- B-Class Internet culture articles
- High-importance Internet culture articles
- WikiProject Internet culture articles
- B-Class Comedy articles
- High-importance Comedy articles
- WikiProject Comedy articles
- B-Class YouTube articles
- Mid-importance YouTube articles
- WikiProject YouTube articles