This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are connected to one of the subjects of this article and need help, please see this page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
What exactly does it mean when people are saying that Dennard Scaling has ended? How is this related to computer clock rates? --NeoUrfahraner (talk) 14:11, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Power density is no longer constant as fabrication process size decreases, leading to increased power usage / reduced performance over what dennard scaling predicts. The primary reason cited for the breakdown is that at small sizes, current leakage poses greater challenges, and also causes the chip to heat up, which creates a threat of thermal runaway and therefore further increases energy costs.--220.127.116.11 (talk) 10:38, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the link. What is still not yet clear to me is the relation of power density and performance. Clearly I see a relation between clock speed and performance, but not the relation between power density and clock speed. See also Talk:Dennard_scaling. --NeoUrfahraner (talk) 09:05, 6 August 2015 (UTC)