Talk:Roland SH-101
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
'Fat' should not be used as a qualifier for sound on wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.3.212.160 (talk) 15:30, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
White roland sh-101
[edit]it seems that white Rolands sh-101 exists. heres a vid evidency: http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=gcaHZzSjn8c# -->imnotanuser 15:35, 5 feb 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.21.29.73 (talk)
Fair use rationale for Image:Rolandsh101.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Rolandsh101.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:38, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Unsourced list
[edit]I moved the list of "notable users" here because it was wholly unsourced. If these musicians' association with the instrument was important, a secondary source will note it, and we should cite it in reference. Until then, let's keep unsourced stuff out of mainspace. czar 14:56, 6 February 2016 (UTC)