Jump to content

Talk:Saint Luke Drawing the Virgin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleSaint Luke Drawing the Virgin is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 6, 2017.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 14, 2016Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 15, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Rogier van der Weyden's painting Saint Luke Drawing the Virgin (c. 1435; pictured) may contain a self-portrait of the artist as Saint Luke, displaying his affinity with the patron saint of the arts?

Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, where it is held

[edit]

4 copies of this painting exists, all of them can be attributed to Rogier van der Weyden (disputed)

    • The Russian tsar bought the Hermitage version from Willem II of the Netherlands. The Hermitage regards its version as the original and the Boston picture as a copy. But the English Wikipedia is written by the Americans, you know. --Ghirla-трёп- 13:37, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Inlines etc

[edit]

Gathering Victoria's inlines, suggestions, comments;

  • Section re Virgin's purity - pgs 8-9 are Purtle?
  • R Campin: consolidate w/ background section above
  • Re throne: duplication
  • Dating based on timber analysis - only 10 years?
  • Albrecht Dürer Diary - repetition
  • essence of the Virgin - repetition, verbose, trim
  • notes, see esp red hats

Ceoil (talk) 11:34, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution

[edit]

I'm not going to tag the article while it's on the main page, but quotations:

The painting established van der Weyden as a progenitor and "inventor [of] authoritative models ... at the foundation of Netherlandish art".

requires attribution. Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 11:37, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removed Ceoil (talk) 13:10, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why has this page been protected for week? It makes it impossible for us poor IPs to make any kind of contribution. So much for the encyclopaedia that anyone can edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.205.198.96 (talk) 11:47, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Saint Luke Drawing the Virgin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:35, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]