Talk:Saint Winifred

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Religion Mid‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Saints Low‑importance

	Saints portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saints, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christian liturgical calendars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SaintsWikipedia:WikiProject SaintsTemplate:WikiProject SaintsSaints articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Religion Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Unreferenced articles

This article was provided with references by an Unreferenced articles project volunteer on 2008-08-05. If you edit this page, please build on the good work by citing your sources.Unreferenced articlesWikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced articlesTemplate:WikiProject Unreferenced articlesUnreferenced articles articles

Welsh name

Hi. I just edited a minor thing I noticed. The native Welsh of Winefride isn't 'Gwenfrewy' as the article stated but 'Gwenffrewi'. - zippy.fuzz@gmail.com 15.02 (GMT) 16/11/06

I notice both spelling are found if you Google it. Who is to say which is correct? Talskiddy 18:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly some rewording is needed. Gwenfrewy is apparently the modern Welsh equivalent of the original, but perhaps not the version in common use? Walgamanus 09:11, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've also found the spelling Wenefreda, in Smith, Brendan(Editor). Britain & Ireland, 900-1300: Insular Responses to Medieval European Change. Port Chester, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 1999. --L Hamm 00:30, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The standard Welsh spelling is 'Gwenfrewi'; I've corrected the name in the article. (Welsh 'f' is pronounced 'v', if somebody feels like putting an IPA pronunciation in). Enaidmawr 00:19, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting book

There is also a very interesting, if not necessarily very accurate book called 'A Morbid Taste for Bones' by Ellis Peters which is a fantasy about how the shrine to Saint Winifred (as the author calls her) came to be at the abbey of St. Peter and St. Paul at Shrewsbury. It sheds an interesting light on how we interpret hagiographies and such.

History of the Shrines & Well

Is the "shrine destroyed" mentioned in the fourth paragraph the shrine at Holywell or in Shropshire? A source (the same I mention above in regard to the spelling "Wenefreda") mentions that a crowd of 1500 gathered at Holywell, probably for the feast day, in 1629. --L Hamm 00:35, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why this spelling of her name?

Since the Welsh spell her name "Gwenffrewi" and the modern English spelling is "Winifred", why was the decision made to title this article "Winefride"? Whose spelling is that, or why did Wikipedia decide that should be the spelling of choice? Just askin'! --MelanieN (talk) 01:39, 10 July 2009 (UTC)MelanieN[reply]

Good catch.

Rule of thumb: if the page starts out by saying "more commonly called X in English"... just go ahead and move the page to X. —

Llywelyn II

11:21, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Various variations"?

In the fist line, isn't various variations a little redundant? Would "numerous variations" sound better?Rhodesisland (talk) 08:24, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Or simply using the most common and putting the others in the {{persondata}}. Yes. —

Llywelyn II

11:22, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hollywell.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Hollywell.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:48, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Saint Winifred. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:40, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]