Jump to content

Talk:San Clemente al Laterano

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was no move. -- tariqabjotu 22:42, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]

Basilica di San ClementeSan Clemente – per consistency among Roman churches, and because currently San Clemente is a redirect FoxyProxy 22:41, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

[edit]

Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

Discussion

[edit]

Add any additional comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Invisible note

[edit]

There's a paragraph that says: There is evidence of pagan worship on the site. In the second century members of a Mithraic cult built a small temple dedicated to Mithras in an insula, or apartment complex, on the site. This temple, used for initiation rituals, lasted until about the third century. Somebody has added, in a way that cannot be seen on the article: "not true:by which time Christianity had largely supplanted pagan worship in Rome." What can't be true is what that hidden note says. If you consider that Diocletian died on 305, and that Christianism was tolerated only after the Edict of Milan (313), this is, at the beginning of the fourth century, you cannot possibly think that Christianity had largely supplanted pagan worship in the third century in Rome. So it should disappear even as an hidden text as now is, unless somebody cites the origin of that sentence. --Joanenglish (talk) 14:22, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Top importance

[edit]

I have raised the importance of this, architecturally, because of the site's rarity in revealing all the layers of building, still accessible to the public, including a Mithraic tomb, and a very rare example of an atrium. Amandajm (talk) 13:38, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]