Jump to content

Talk:Silvio Berlusconi prostitution trial

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Change of name of article - what would it be better called?

[edit]

Hi all. Berlusconi has been acquitted of all the charges flowing from this particular matter on appeal. I made a "quick and dirty" (no pun intended) change of article name to reflect this. My own opinion is that it would still count as a scandal, howsoever described. Is this still a WP:BLP violation? What would be a better article title? Should this even have an article on its own, or is it a WP:COATRACK to hang criticism of Berlusconi on? Please discuss. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 13:41, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

innocent now - wp:blp - moved to Silvio Berlusconi prostitute trial Mosfetfaser (talk) 15:11, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Silvio Berlusconi prostitute trial. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:46, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Under-age Prostitute term

[edit]

I question the term under-age prostitute used in this article. A minor being coerced or accepting money for "sexual favours" should surely not be labelled as a prostitute. This term is being slipped into the lexicon by apologists, legal representatives and spin (main stream) media, to lessen the carnal proclivities of rich and powerful people, who use their wealth to abuse minors. This is not a Political Correctness thing (either way). Sexual exploitation of minors using money should be described rather Ad-hominem on the youngsters. Hopefully we will eventually learn something post Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Epstein and Jimmy Saville Jimmy Saville — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.145.3.178 (talk) 06:40, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]