Talk:Sioux Lookout

Canada: Ontario / Communities Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian communities.

Brochure

Does anyone know about the CBC news story referencing a brochure and Sioux lookout? "Mayor Kathy Poling said the Edmonton publishing company responsible for the brochure took the description of the community from a user-edited online encyclopedia, without proofreading it or checking the facts." Is this a reference to wikipedia?

CBC Insulting brochure offends Sioux Lookout residents--Zegoma beach 17:18, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, this edit. Beats me why CBC wouldn't mention Wikipedia by name. — mendel ☎ _ * _ 19:28, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good job Mendel; I missed that going through the history. --Zegoma beach 20:19, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sioux Falls, Ont., up in arms over 'slanderous' pamphlets article at the National Post says Mayor Kathy Poling, who was out of town yesterday, told the local newspaper that she believes the "slanderous" and "hurtful" misinformation came from Wikipedia, the user-generated online encyclopedia, and was not checked before the printing company sent the brochures out to hotels. [...] The company produced new brochures and sent them about a week later. Some hotels put them directly into the garbage. "The worst mistake was the fact that they didn't proofread it ... You only had to read for six seconds. It's not like it was buried, it was the second line," said Suzanne Favot, a manager at Sunset Inn & Suites. "For a company to behave in that manner, without verifying their [materials] before sending it, I am not interested in having any of their stuff in my rooms.". 4.250.198.132 01:13, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Me wonders why the National Post would call it Sioux Falls. Eclecticology 17:01, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. Ignorance is bliss? -- Zanimum 19:21, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added it to the article with a couple of citations, but Zanimum removed it. I think it probably merits a brief mention, but I'll let the people who care more decide. —dgies^t_c 20:02, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dgies, I see where you're going, but I'm going to vote with Zanimum on this on to keep it in the talk page; It's a self-reference.--Zegoma beach 20:56, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CTV & Global Tv

I noted that Sioux Lookout receives CBC and TVO via retransmitters. Where does it receive CTV and Global from? --Jimj wpg 21:38, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Infrastructure Section.

The Town Revitalization Project has been finished, like four years ago.

should we update it now?

PrinceTanglemane (talk) 19:41, 16 March 2015 (UTC)Prince Tanglemane from, the Hub of the North.[reply]

Requested move 14 October 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Re-sync with the article; a simple technical request. wbm1058 (talk) 16:27, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sioux Lookout, Ontario → Sioux Lookout – Talk page and actual page are different (one has Ontario, the other doesn't). This should be speedily moved so that they match one another. Doesn't matter which one it ends up as, as long as they match. I currently can't do this myself due to overriding redirects. Redditaddict69 ^(talk) ^(contribs) 01:37, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.