Talk:Star Trek: The Next Generation/Doctor Who: Assimilation²

Comics Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Star Trek Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Doctor Who Low‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Klingons and the Doctor

[The Doctor] somehow recognised Worf as a Klingon despite having never even heard the word 'Klingon' before now.

Does the comic say that the Doctor has never heard the word “Klingon” before? If not, is there a reliable source that says so? Or is this WP:OR? —Frungi (talk) 08:22, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After buying it, I can verify this. On page 49 of the digital Volume 1, the Doctor says:

“I seem to be remembering things that have never happened to me. […] I had never even heard the word ‘Klingon’ before…”

I rewrote the sentence in an attempt to make it more clear that this is the case, rather than someone being snarky as I first suspected. —Frungi (talk) 03:57, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Too much plot

The Plot section seems a little long for an article that has nothing else. Can anyone add other sections? “Reception”, maybe? —Frungi (talk) 08:25, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unless there is compelling reason not to, I plan on heavily trimming the current summary, replacing it with perhaps one sentence per paragraph. I think that would be sufficient for an article that is nothing but a plot summary. —Frungi (talk) 00:11, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve rewritten the summary of what I’ve read, shortening it up by about half I think, but even that still seems too long for an otherwise empty article. I plan on shortening it further, perhaps to only two or three paragraphs total for all eight issues. Input from anyone else would be welcome, especially disagreement. —Frungi (talk) 02:08, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It’s done. It could probably stand a bit of copy-editing, but I’ve cut it down from eight lengthy paragraphs to two and a half paragraphs. Note that I still haven’t read the final three issues of the comic, so if I included something unnecessary or left out something important, please do fix that. —Frungi (talk) 04:16, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Star Trek: The Next Generation/Doctor Who: Assimilation2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130410160116/http://www.idwpublishing.com/news/article/2224 to http://www.idwpublishing.com/news/article/2224/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]