Talk:Star Wars Outlaws

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 12 June 2023 by reviewer ScottishFinnishRadish (talk · contribs).

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (7 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (3 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Star Wars Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Wars, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Star Wars saga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Star WarsWikipedia:WikiProject Star WarsTemplate:WikiProject Star WarsStar Wars articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Star Wars To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Tag the talk pages of Star Wars-related articles with the {{WikiProject Star Wars}} banner. Update the classification of articles in Category:Unassessed Star Wars articles and Category:Unknown-importance Star Wars articles.
Citing sources : Jedi, Sith
Cleanup : Remove any In-universe information at Category:Star Wars articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction.
Copyedit : Under Early Life. Fix grammar of "towns (plural) predominantly Protestant technical college" to "town's (possessive)..."
Stubs : Category:Star Wars stubs
Other : * See the things to do page
- Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability

Citelead

Hi Darkage7! WP:CITELEAD is a style guideline, it says there is no need for an inline reference in the lead (or in the infobox for that matter). You might want to double check, I actually didn't remove but simply moved the reference. I moved it down and put a bit in the development section, which probably will be expanded to a release section pretty soon. With your revert, you also put the unnecessary bit about a rating in South Korea. Would you mind undoing your revert? Thanks, and happy editing! soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 19:19, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I found that MOS article shortly after making the change, but I read it to actually encourage us to put the citation there. Feels weird to state a fact of wikipedia and just not cite it until much later, when named citations are a thing.

Although the presence of citations in the lead is neither required in every article nor prohibited in any article, there is no exception to citation requirements specific to leads. The necessity for citations in a lead should be determined on a case-by-case basis by editorial consensus. Complex, current, or controversial subjects may require many citations; others, few or none.

I'll remove the South Korea rating thing.

Darkage7 _[Talk] 19:37, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Usually I try to keep refs out of the lead, with the many, many things that can be cited but that's not an issue at this point. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 19:50, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unplayable

It should be added somewhere that the game is currently unplayable on most Win11 PCs and that Ubisoft is doing a Ubisoft, not commenting or acknowledging. It's a real shame on such a promising game. At least the 5-10 minutes at a time I get to play it before it just shuts itself off completely. For someone like me that use Wikipedia as a source of information before buying a game, it would be nice to have such things added to the page. 90.224.135.197 (talk) 12:45, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a well-known and widely reported issue, it will presumably be covered in reliable secondary sources. Feel free to be be bold in adding the content, as long as it is properly sourced. Grandpallama (talk) 13:18, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]