Talk:The Grim Adventures of Billy & Mandy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Former featured article candidate The Grim Adventures of Billy & Mandy is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
May 29, 2006 Featured article candidate Not promoted
edit·history·watch·refresh Stock post message.svg To-do list for The Grim Adventures of Billy & Mandy:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
  • Expand : The "Reception" section needs to be expanded with more reviews. It would also help if some character design sources could be found for the "Characters" section.


July 31, 2008 -- Paper Luigi Talk Contributions 01:37, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Where did the "Controversy" section go?[edit]

Does anyone know? -Halen of HPNC —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 19:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Most likely deleted if there was nothing to back the claims up. treelo radda 19:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Fan Fictions[edit]

Should fan fictions like 'Snafu's "Grim Tales' be added? —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 08:36, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Are you meaning just a regualar fanfic? If it is not official, it really shouldn't be mentioned specifically...Unless it went something like,"The Grim adventures continues to be very popular and a variety of fanfiction has been created...examples being "TitleofFanFic".At least, that's my view. It should at least be mentioned that there are some, but that's just me.It probably didn't help, sorry. --MinaBlues 17:59, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
To answer both of your queries, no, never. baa! radda 19:11, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Of course it should. In See Also sections or something. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kurtle (talkcontribs) 17:04, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Category:The Grim Adventures of Billy & Mandy[edit]

Why can't the Wikipedia experts just create a category for things related to the Grim Adventures of Billy & Mandy if the show is so popular and has a fanbase? They should create "Category:The Grim Adventures of Billy & Mandy" for articles related to that show. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 22:47, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Commentary about series' success, etc[edit]

Recently LoverVideogame2 has added content that I don't find useful. ([1][2]) Commentary like "As of 2014 Billy and Mandy remains as the number one best successful shows Cartoon Network has ever made" needs to be adequately sourced. "Success" is subjective. "Best" doesn't even belong in the article. We're not interested in the opinions of editors, we only care about the opinions of reliable sources. Secondly, this content, "Creator Maxwell Atoms posted on his blog and said if he could he would revive the show but he would also want to work on other projects" is not particularly noteworthy. It doesn't suggest that there will be a revival, it doesn't suggest that there could be a revival, it only suggests that Atoms, if he could, would be interested in reviving the series. This is meaningless. Presumably anybody who was given an opportunity to revive something that was taken off the air might say that they would want to do so. Attempting to draw a conclusion, particularly one that is being highlighted as "Possible revival" is inappropriate. (I will also note that it has been added before, and removed.) For these reasons, I have again cut the content. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:26, 28 August 2014 (UTC)