Talk:The Opium War (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Chinese cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the War films task force.

China: Cinema Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Chinese cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Requested move 12 March 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No move. Cúchullain ^t/c 15:53, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Opium War (film) → The Opium War – No need for a disambiguator, because target is just a redirect Petr Matas 05:05, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Philg88 ^♦talk 07:32, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do not concur that this is an uncontroversial move. The film is about the First Opium War, referred to also as the Opium War, (hence the redirect). I am not convinced that the film is the primary topic of this title and would prefer seeing it vetted by a requested move.--John Cline (talk) 06:34, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with John Cline. The primary topic is clearly the Opium War itself, not the movie about it. The war is going to be primary topic rather than the movie about the war, every time. Jack N. Stock (talk) 06:59, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: There have been several discussions over the years on what the topic "Opium War" should point to (see for example here). The issue of the film grabbing the primary topic has never arisen as far as I can remember. Philg88 ^♦talk 07:42, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per @John Cline:, @Jacknstock: title correctly WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT redirects to First Opium War In ictu oculi (talk) 18:11, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as a re-creation of historical events,there must be a note, or the reader will think that the contents of the re-creation as a real historical events.--Tr56tr (talk) 16:49, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the primary topic is certainly the (first) opium war itself. -Zanhe (talk) 18:37, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.