This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Objectivism, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ObjectivismWikipedia:WikiProject ObjectivismTemplate:WikiProject ObjectivismObjectivism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
This article has no third-party sources, and almost no sources at all. Is this guy truly notable, even? Whoever started this page failed to provide an answer to that basic question. Academic38 (talk) 22:02, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A Google Scholar search on 'Tibor Machan -author:Machan' (the last bit to exclude his own articles, which are numerous) produces over a thousand hits, which suggests that he is notable under WP:PROF based on having a significant impact in his chosen field (point 1), and according to the article he holds a named chair (point 5). So he's should be safe on notability. However, it is true that there is an unfortunate lack of sources in the article. What's really ironic is that he has published a memoir, so there should be ample opportunity to produce a sourced bio, even if the sourcing isn't entirely independent. But instead we have the all-too-common, "if it isn't online, it may as well not exist" approach to sourcing. --RL0919 (talk) 22:44, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. Feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 02:25, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.