Talk:Turkic mythology

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Recent edits[edit]

I removed the "prod" template since this is certainly a perfectly legitimate encyclopedic topic. However I removed the text, which is from http://web.mst.edu/~gdoty/poems/altaic/creation.html as an apparent violation of copyright. I also added a bit of text, another ref, a cat and stubbed.

But I wonder whether this article should be named instead Turkic mythology?

Paul August 20:06, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Expand[edit]

I expanded this artice some. I used materials from Murad Adji's book "The Kipchaks". And I also deleted "Turkey related article" stuff, 'cause it is about ALL turkic mythology, not only of Anatolian turks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.82.23.131 (talkcontribs)

Good job. I've cleaned up the English and links a bit. Coyoty 16:48, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The content of this page is utter travesty. It has nothing to do with Turkic Mythology or Tengriism. If you are really interested in this please check this web site: http://aton.ttu.edu/OLD_TURK_DEITIES.asp

yes[edit]

But I wonder whether this article should be named instead Turkic mythology?

sure, tatars are turks


Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Jenks24 (talk) 10:50, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Turkic mythologyTurkish mythology – Only looking at the Google Books searches show clearly that the academia prefer "Turkish mythology" about five times over "Turkic mythology". Wikipedia is not intended to create new terminology but to use existing ones in its contents. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 15:11, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, Wikipedia usage reflects established academic usage, where "Turkic" and "Turkish" are consistently distinguished. BabelStone (talk) 18:21, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per User:BabelStone and WP:PRECISION. Wikipedia did not invent the term "Turkic" and the article (which could use a lot of work) deals with the mythology of all Turkic peoples or Turkic peoples in general and not only the Turkish people, i.e. the people of Turkey. Of course there are many Google books hits for "Turkish mythology" as this is the largest Turkic nation. And there is a great degree of overlap between the two topics (most Turkish mythology is Turkic mythtology). However, the title should correctly reflect the entire scope of the article. —  AjaxSmack  18:12, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment how is this novel creation when you yourself say it is used in literature? Clearly if it is used, it is not a creation of Wikipedia. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 04:46, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Turkic mythology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:21, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Section "Traces of Turkic mythology in Europe"[edit]

The section seems to be written in a non-encyclopedic tone, with personal observations. It also lacks references to reliable and current sources. KHR FolkMyth (talk) 20:40, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:08, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]