Jump to content

Talk:Tyrone Garland

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleTyrone Garland is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 17, 2015.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 21, 2015Good article nomineeListed
August 17, 2015Featured article candidateNot promoted
October 22, 2015Featured article candidatePromoted
December 10, 2022Featured article reviewDemoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 29, 2015.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that former John Bartram High School basketball player Tyrone Garland scored the third-most points in Philadelphia Public League history, being surpassed only by Maureece Rice and Wilt Chamberlain?
Current status: Former featured article
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tyrone Garland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:00, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tyrone Garland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:57, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This older FA promotion needs a little TLC to get back to the WP:FACR criteria. RidiculousUpside.com and SportsWar are blogs that are questionable if they meets the higher "high-quality RS" standard for FAs. The coverage for his 2019 and 2020 playing stints are too thin - we're given nothing about how he played in 2020, and it's not even clear how much he played in 2019. These spots need some expansion to give a clearer idea of what he did. Also unsure about the reliance on press releases/game summaries in the article. An example of a sourcing problem However, the Hokies easily won the game, 70–60 - source is a box score, and "easily" is an original research determination of the score. Not sure that it's warranted, as the ESPN recap for the game includes quotes such as I don't think we've had a great opener since I've been here from the coach, Wasn't giving Virginia Tech too solid a review of its season opener, etc. Large swaths of the article are sourced only to box scores, state sites, or non-independent releases from the team he played for. There should be more coverage not from teams he was playing for at the time for FA status. Hog Farm Talk 20:03, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]