Talk:Ukraine International Airlines

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Merge from Ukraine International[edit]

I've proposed the merger because the pages are about the same airline. This page should remain because it's the correct company name. Robwingfield 00:29, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Merged, as no desent. Robwingfield 12:47, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ukraine International Airlines.PNG[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Ukraine International Airlines.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:27, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

The capital of Ukraine is the City of Kyiv - Article 20 of Ukrainian Constitution[edit]

Article 20 - The capital of Ukraine is the City of Kyiv -

Yes, google finds more for Kiev than Kyiv, but you shouldn't ignore changes. When you come to KBP you see Kyiv written in yellow colour on the terminal B. Still ignoring? Should we change ukrainian constitution only due to google search result? Definetly, no!!! Of course in USSR Kyiv in every foreign press was spelled as Kiev. As a result it caused a habit to spell name of the capital of Ukraine in wrong way even up to day, but we are not living in USSR anymore. We are living in independent Ukraine and the capital of this country is Kyiv. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SWC (talkcontribs) 16:12, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

It is normal to use the common english name as used in the related article Kiev, when and if that article changes then it can be changed here. If you have a problem with the use of the name then please raise is at Talk:Kiev/naming, thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 16:30, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

There are several requests at the article about KIEV to change it to, its for me the question, why admins in wikipedia are blocking this change...Bayernbanker (talk) 16:07, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

did anyone think of using "UkraiYna" instead of "Ukraine" in English Language? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 17:00, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Completely agree! - US-Government writes KYIV like UK does - f.e., so why to use an old version - KIEV, which ukrainians by themselves do not use?? (talk) 16:03, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Just to make it clear if the article moves from Kiev then we can change it here, you need to make your case at that article for changing the name. MilborneOne (talk) 13:27, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

What means CIP ?[edit]

Someone can explain what means CIP in 'History' section?جمال بركات (talk) 18:56, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Spelling of address[edit]

Google maps uses "Kharkivs'ke Hwy, 201/203 Kiev, Kyiv city, Ukraine" WhisperToMe (talk) 02:26, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ukraine International Airlines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Non-notable Incidents[edit]

I have removed the non-notable incidents again, accidents and incidents need to to be of note (hull loss or fatality for example) but these additions dont meet the project criteria. As a challenged addition then the proposer to make a case why these trivial incidents should be included and should gain a consensus to add them, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 20:37, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Notification of this discussion has been left at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airlines MilborneOne (talk) 15:43, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Like in several portraits about airlines accidents like overrans of runway are mentioned - f.e. the Fokker 70 of Austrian in MUC (also no hull-loss or fatality!) - so I cannot agree with the individual opinion of MilBorneOne. If incidents are mentioned in the incidents for investigation of the national aviation authority (like in this case of UIA)- its surely worth to mention. If there is also a trend of accumulating incidents - it should be published, cause its an interesting information. Bayernbanker (talk) 16:04, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Just because it is interesting doesnt make it encyclopedic, also note this is not my opinion but an agreed guideline on inclusion at Wikipedia:AIRLINE-CONTENT, you need to read it and explain why you think these incidents meet the criteria, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 16:24, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
It is interesting for you and this is not your personal website. Read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Furthermore, this [1] is no vandalism at all. This is what vandalism actually is.--Jetstreamer Talk 21:16, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Jetstreamer, why you see f.e. overruns at AEROLINAS ARGENTINAS as being worth to mention and at UIA not? Again, read carefully what I wrote, please! - I just followed the logic of another airticles. Concerning vandalism - undiscussed deletion of verified and true content is not covered by the guidelines, isnt it? So, how else to call it than vandalism? Beside this - wikipedia is also not to built on the personal logic of Jetstreamer, correct? Bayernbanker (talk) 07:40, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Overruns are notable if the aircraft involved was written off. Read WP:AIRCRASH for the criteria of inclusion.--Jetstreamer Talk 13:39, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ukraine International Airlines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:05, 8 September 2016 (UTC)