Jump to content

Talk:Ward v. Flood

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk17:47, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Cielquiparle (talk). Self-nominated at 21:00, 2 February 2023 (UTC). Note: As of October 2022, all changes made to promoted hooks will be logged by a bot. The log for this nomination can be found at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Ward v. Flood, so please watch a successfully closed nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: @Cielquiparle: Good article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:25, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decision

[edit]

Hi Cielquiparle, thanks for this article. I've read "Further, the state supreme court ruled that excluding black children from nonwhite schools would not be allowed unless separate schools were available" a number of times and read the case reports and am thinking "nonwhite" should be 'white'. But I'm not feeling bold or certain enough to change it. Am I just confused? JennyOz (talk) 23:42, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes @JennyOz. Have corrected mistake. Thanks so much for your careful proofreading! Cielquiparle (talk) 23:49, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All good! Thanks, JennyOz (talk) 02:33, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]