Talk:Water supply and sanitation in China

Water supply and sanitation in China received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

A fact from Water supply and sanitation in China appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 June 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in China, access to water supply and sanitation varies greatly between rural areas, where only 67% of the population has access to improved water supply, and cities, where 93% does?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/June.

Wikipedia

Water Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Water, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Water supply-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WaterWikipedia:WikiProject WaterTemplate:WikiProject WaterWater articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sanitation Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sanitation, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sanitation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SanitationWikipedia:WikiProject SanitationTemplate:WikiProject Sanitationsanitation articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

China High‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger proposal

The three articles Water supply and sanitation in the People's Republic of China, Chinese water crisis‎, and Water resources of the People's Republic of China all discuss water resources, shortages, and responses. There are no clear boundaries between them. Therefore I propose they should be merged to this article. There are numerous articles titled "Water supply and sanitation in... " for other nations so this seems to be the preferred title for these issues. Academica Orientalis (talk) 23:22, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Very strong OPPOSE. This is a second irrational merge suggestion from you. All three articles are notable in their own right. Also, have a read of WP:Other stuff exists. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 23:53, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Water pollution and shortages is discussed in all three articles. How do we avoid duplication? What material should go into what article? Academica Orientalis (talk) 01:48, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:SUMMARYSTYLE. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 02:19, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That is not really helpful here. Which is proper article in which to have the main discussion of, say, pollution of Chinese rivers from municipal sources? Academica Orientalis (talk) 02:39, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

At a Water pollution in China article but since it does not exist it should be at Pollution in China. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 02:45, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

But this pollution is an important aspect of all of the three articles mentioned above. Or to take another example, which is the main article for discussing the water shortage? Academica Orientalis (talk) 02:56, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Which is exactly why there is a need for a Water pollution in China article. The Chinese water crisis‎ is for discussing water shortages. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 03:00, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Water shortages are obviously part of Water resources also. Sanitation directly affects pollution. Pollution directly affects available water resources. Academica Orientalis (talk) 03:08, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I can help in moving this discussion in a more constructive way. In my view, Chinese water crisis and Water resources of the PRC should be merged into one article, but Water supply and sanitation in the PRC should remain a separate article. Why? (Drinking) water supply and sanitation is an activity carried out by utilities. Physically it covers the water cycle from the point of abstraction (well, river intake) to the point of discharge (into a river, a lake, the sea etc.). Water resources obviously is much broader. It covers the water cycle from when the rain hits the ground to when the rivers join the sea. The two topics are interrelated, but it is quite common among professional to draw a line between water supply and sanitation on the one hand and water resources (management) on the other. Of course there can, and indeed should, be a small summary of each article in the other one, with a "For more details see" reference to the main article. Water pollution, in my view, is a sub-topic of water resources (management). It deserves an article of its own, but a summary of it and a reference to it could be includes in both the water resources article and the water supply and sanitation article. I hope that this helps.--Mschiffler (talk) 07:19, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like good suggestions. I suggest concentrating on improving and adding material to the Water resources article for now. If there is enough material specifically about pollution then a separate article for that can be created. Academica Orientalis (talk) 21:07, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As per above, I have moved all the material in the water crises article to the water resource article and will change that article to a redirect. Removing the other merge suggestions and templates. Academica Orientalis (talk) 23:27, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Water supply and sanitation in China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:10, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Water supply and sanitation in China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070301021559/http://www.mwr.gov.cn:80/english1/about.asp to http://www.mwr.gov.cn/english1/about.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:21, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]