Talk:What Up with That?

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Television

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

What Up vs. What's Up

So "what's up" with the change from "What Up With That?" to "What'S Up With That?"? Am I the only one who noticed? 75.92.62.160 (talk) 19:19, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Parody?

So is this skit making fun of anything in real life? I always thought this was a parody of someone.

I don't think it's based off of someone in particular, but rather just talk shows in general that get so wrapped up in the host's antics that things of substance are pushed aside. Like "Top Music Countdowns" that cut the actual songs short so the host could ramble on, promote other shows, etc. I have no source for that though...Sergecross73 msg me 16:59, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of notability

There are zero third party sources in this article and so it fails the notability requirement for a stand alone article. Active Banana (^bananaphone 18:47, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Can't argue that. Shouldn't it just go through the whole deletion process though, not just a redirect?~~ It's not like a redirect to the main SNL page is helpful at all for someone looking for "What's Up with That?" Sergecross73 msg me 19:17, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Scratch that. I found a number of reliable, third party sources. They're out there, it's just that no one bothers to find them. I know the article certainly isn't in the greatest of shape, but I added a couple as a start, as a sign that the article should stay. Sergecross73 msg me 00:59, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers

SNL wasn't the first to make "What's up with that?" a catchphrase. Cheers clip 108.93.144.242 (talk) 15:04, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's a pretty common phrase really, and there's not like the article claims that this is where it originates, so... Sergecross73 msg me 18:26, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Episodes

In the Episodes section it's confusing that the celebrities making unannounced cameos are put in the Guest column while the celebrities appearing as themselves on the show within the sketch are listed in the Celebrity cameos section. I would suggest they be switched. Also, on the December 4, 2010 show, Robert De Niro and Robin Williams both appeared as guests on the show within the sketch, so they should be in the same column one way or another. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.87.141.16 (talk) 10:02, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mixed Reception

It's not appropriate to say that the sketch has received mixed reviews and only cite one source on that. I think the assertion that the sketch has received mixed reviews should be removed until more feedback of the sketch can be documented. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.59.55.239 (talk) 15:11, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I dug through the page history and that seemed to be leftover from many years prior, when the reception section had different content in it. Sergecross73 msg me 16:46, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 04 June 2014

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. It is clear that consensus is against the original intent of this request, and its modified proposal. The suggestion of whether to add a disambiguating term might better be contemplated in a separate RM. I have implemented the redirects suggested by User:In ictu oculi as an act of editorial discretion. Xoloz (talk) 03:50, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What Up with That → What's Up With That? – per lead & http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/episode-guide/season-38/martin-short-with-paul-mccartney/1630 (click "more") – 81.132.66.47 (talk) 23:42, 4 June 2014 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). EdJohnston (talk) 03:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Per MOS:CT. When a preposition of no more than four letters is used in a composition title, it is not capitalized. The word 'with' is specifically mentioned in the guideline. EdJohnston (talk) 03:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per above, but doesn't mean that What's Up with That? (sketch) wouldn't be a better title. What's Up with That was a redirect to What's Up with That (ZZ Top song), but I've turned it into a dab. ~~Is the sketch primary topic? and should be moved to What's Up with That (disambiguation)~~ I think it isn't, but whatever. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:53, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I could only find one reference to this sketch in Google Books New York 2009 -- Volume 42 - Page 114 "Saturday Night Live's Kenan Thompson is finally a major not-ready-for-prime-time player. The comedian's sketches “Scared Straight," “Virginiaca,” and “What Up With That?.. "(note the spelling). This article really needs (sketch) if it is to move to proposed spelling. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:13, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose "What's Up With That?" should be a disambiguation page, as there are several uses (sections of articles) [1] -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:59, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
NOTE What's Up with That is a different article -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:59, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Alternative proposal: What's Up with That? (per nbc.com) 81.132.66.47 (talk) 06:06, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose alternative - this 2009 sketch is barely notable, What's Up with That? should redirect to the What's Up with That list of other en.wp content. What's Up with That? (sketch) would be okay In ictu oculi (talk) 06:24, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on What Up with That. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100110162817/http://www.theinsider.com:80/news/3088685__What_Up_With_That_A_Wacky_Funny_SNL_Sketch_Go_Keenan to http://www.theinsider.com/news/3088685__What_Up_With_That_A_Wacky_Funny_SNL_Sketch_Go_Keenan

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:47, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source

https://apple.news/AtW8W6M_6QfyUeeMQoCMmSQ Sergecross73 msg me 16:44, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]