This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
A fact from William Villiers, 2nd Viscount Grandison appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 February 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
I've made a few modifications, and split the first section off from the lead, since the lead should be a summary of the entire article. In the Eulogy section, is the separate reference for the quote-within-the-quote necessary? If the shorter quote was included entirely in the larger quote, the reference for the larger quote should support the whole thing. Also, the authorship of the Whitney Van Dyck isn't explicitly mentioned; when did it become attributed to him? --Paul_012 (talk) 01:49, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Good points Paul_012. On the Clarendon quotation, I moved from one source to another and perhaps should have ditched one. I'll see if I can fathom the attribution to Van Dyck, but as the sources show the painting has little or no provenance before the mid 19th century, I guess it must be a matter of judgement by Van Dyck experts. Moonraker (talk) 07:00, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
