Template:Did you know nominations/Aulacaspis yasumatsui
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 04:04, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Aulacaspis yasumatsui
[edit]- ... that "crawler" cycad scale insects sometimes get blown away by the wind, landing on nearby plants and infesting them?
- Reviewed: Jerry London (wrestler)
5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 18:21, 21 April 2017 (UTC).
- Though this might be because googlebooks is being very stingy in how much of the book I'm allowed to read, I cannot see where in the source it states that the crawlers get blown by the wind? PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 07:38, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- I seem to have mixed up the sources. It's in the Bahadur source, and I have rearranged the citations accordingly. I can often persuade Google Books to supply extra pages by searching the book for appropriate words, "yasumatsui" in this example. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:47, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Yes that solves it. On another point, I'm wondering about the use of the word "infecting"; this seems to me to be an inappropriate verb, applicable only to non-animal pathogens (viruses, bacteria, fungi etc.) that get inside the plant and cause disease. "Infesting" or "starting a new infestation" seem more suitable. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 06:01, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
- You are probably right, and I have changed the hook and article accordingly. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:07, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks! PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 08:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- Is this nomination ready for a tick? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:32, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- I don't know - my comments weren't intended as part of a review, and I'm not fully cognizant of all the rules around promotion. (I actually thought - somewhat mistakenly - that it already had been reviewed, by an editor named "Jerry London (wrestler)", but I see now that that refers to a DYK nom that you reviewed...). PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 07:56, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
- That's OK, your comments have been useful and someone else can review the nomination. You will not need to do a review until you have made 5 DYK nominations; you will find the instructions on how to review near the top of the nominations page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:10, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
- I don't know - my comments weren't intended as part of a review, and I'm not fully cognizant of all the rules around promotion. (I actually thought - somewhat mistakenly - that it already had been reviewed, by an editor named "Jerry London (wrestler)", but I see now that that refers to a DYK nom that you reviewed...). PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 07:56, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
- Is this nomination ready for a tick? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:32, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks! PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 08:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- You are probably right, and I have changed the hook and article accordingly. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:07, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
- Yes that solves it. On another point, I'm wondering about the use of the word "infecting"; this seems to me to be an inappropriate verb, applicable only to non-animal pathogens (viruses, bacteria, fungi etc.) that get inside the plant and cause disease. "Infesting" or "starting a new infestation" seem more suitable. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 06:01, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
- I seem to have mixed up the sources. It's in the Bahadur source, and I have rearranged the citations accordingly. I can often persuade Google Books to supply extra pages by searching the book for appropriate words, "yasumatsui" in this example. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:47, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Decent article, on few but good sources, offline sources accepted AGF, no copyvio obvious. - Thank you for the good work already done, above! - I don't think the hook is particular to these, could be said about many. Could you try something more specific. I will approve, if not. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:32, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
- Scale insects in general are all female and have no wings. The adults settle in one spot to suck sap and do not move. I was interested therefore to learn that the crawlers (young) could get blown away by the wind because in general, the insects must have difficulty in spreading to new plants. I have written a few articles on scale insects in the past amd have never come across mention of this before. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:54, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
thanks for explaining! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:04, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
- Scale insects in general are all female and have no wings. The adults settle in one spot to suck sap and do not move. I was interested therefore to learn that the crawlers (young) could get blown away by the wind because in general, the insects must have difficulty in spreading to new plants. I have written a few articles on scale insects in the past amd have never come across mention of this before. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:54, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
