Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Martha Hackett

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Martha Hackett's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:55, 10 March 2013 (UTC).

Martha Hackett

[edit]

5x expanded by Miyagawa (talk). Self nominated at 14:19, 4 March 2013 (UTC).

  • Seems fine. The hook is sourced and the article itself is neutral. I'm a little confused about the prose length requirements for this article. Can somebody check that up and give a final verdict? Ashwin147 (talk) 05:10, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Looks good to me. The filmography is a list therefore doesn't count as part of the original article character count. The article has been expanded from only 233 charcaters to over 2,000! Good to go. Sionk (talk) 13:11, 9 March 2013 (UTC)