Template:Did you know nominations/Messe modale en septuor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 13:15, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Messe modale en septuor

Interior of Saint-Nicolas, facing the organ
Interior of Saint-Nicolas, facing the organ

Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self-nominated at 10:56, 21 June 2022 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: New enough, long enough, neutral, sourced. Hook is interesting and picture is clear. Article is free from plagiarism (Earwig's Copyvio Detector score 13.8%, violation unlikely). QPQ has been done. JIP | Talk 16:14, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the review, and the patience. I reviewed now Template:Did you know nominations/Candler Building (New York City). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
JIP | Talk 21:44, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Noting that the following hook was proposed by Narutolovehinata5 on the DYK talk page:
@Gerda Arendt: The text "The Messe modale is a modal mass for soprano, alto, flute and string quartet" is cited to page 58 in Shrock's Choral Repetoire. I was able to find a copy of the book on archive.org and page 58 doesn't correspond to this information. Was a different page number supposed to be cited instead? Z1720 (talk) 15:37, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
I missed another ALT that was proposed on WT:DYK, not sure who proposed it:
I think that's all of them. Z1720 (talk) 15:40, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Thank you, - sorry that I copied the page number wrong. 587, not 58. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:54, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Readding tick, hook is verified. Z1720 (talk) 19:53, 21 July 2022 (UTC)