Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Wolkentanz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:04, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Wolkentanz

[edit]

Created by Montanabw (talk). Nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk) at 08:01, 8 July 2016 (UTC).

  • No issues found with article, ready for human review.
    • This article is new and was created on 04:47, 07 July 2016 (UTC)
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 2753 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • The probability of copyright violation is 10.7%. (confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  • No overall issues detected

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 22:38, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

  • New enough, long enough, and well sourced, as the bot noted. The 10.7% textual overlap found by the bot is mostly phrases used as proper nouns; there is one long similar textual phrase, "the best stallion of his age group", but that appears to be a complete rephrasing of its actual source ("the best sire of his vintage") that coincidentally matches another site. QPQ done. The hook is interresting enough and adequately sourced. The sentence containing the "21 licensed stallions" claim is ungrammatical; please fix. Otherwise, good to go. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:51, 18 July 2016 (UTC)