Template talk:Pokémon directory

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pokémon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Pokémon universe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PokémonWikipedia:WikiProject PokémonTemplate:WikiProject PokémonPokémon articles

Video games

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

No did you know nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

This template was considered for merging with Template:Pokémon on 28 September 2010. The result of the discussion was "no consensus".

Update request

I suggest this template to be updated, with the addition of Generation V, something like this:

When a list is created, then it will be on the template. A template links together pages of a similar type. It isn't an information tool. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 14:47, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Individual species

Since all the pages on specific Pokemon are now being merged into the Lists, what should we do about all the individual ones? They're all becoming redirects, so is it worth keeping them? Supernerd11 :D Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 01:12, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we may as well just redirect them ourselves to get the job done. It's not an easy job to put those Pokè-weeaboos in their place, but it'll teach them a lesson: You can't slime up a serious website for adults with your kiddie cruft. Tezero (talk) 01:44, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ultra Beasts article?

Is it worth putting up an article for the Ultra Beasts? I think they deserve an article due to their uniqueness.... Visokor (talk) 16:39, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We don't create articles on Pokemon just because they are unique. Read WP:GNG, the topic needs to meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability, that means significant coverage from reliable secondary sources. There's no point creating the article if its just going to fictional in-game info; it will just get nominated for deletion. --The1337gamer (talk) 17:05, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Let me rephrase that. Their "significance" to the story of Sun and Moon, including the villainess' motives... Visokor (talk) 10:49, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Again, that's irrelevant. "Does it meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability?" is the only question you should be considering. --The1337gamer (talk) 10:52, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]