User:Doug Coldwell/Sandboxes/Archive 24

John S. Hougham link?

Hello friend,

I was wondering why you seemed to have unlinked "solar compass" from the John S. Hougham entry? Many thanks, Gavin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anomicworld (talk • contribs) 23:58, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Burt's solar compass

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Burt's solar compass you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 18:01, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Burt's solar compass

The article Burt's solar compass you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Burt's solar compass for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 08:20, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Burt's solar compass

The article Burt's solar compass you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Burt's solar compass for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 13:02, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

I passed it but I am not sure why the bot says it failed. I will add the GA topicon to the article manually. Thank you. — The Most Comfortable Chair 13:06, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Secrets of the Wiki-trade

@The Most Comfortable Chair: Thanks for adding GA topicon to article. I have seen this before of the bot saying it has failed when the GA reviewer puts it in as a pass. It seems to do this when the article failed GA before, so apparently it is a software problem with the bot. Maybe we will come across each other again. You do in-depth reviews and this one sure had me thinking. I'm hoping to get a total of 100 GAs before the end of the year.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 14:36, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, and I hope you get there. How many do you have by now? — The Most Comfortable Chair 15:51, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

By my count of GA topicons on my User Page I now have 70. I do about 8 Good Articles per month, so if my luck holds out then I should have 100 for my birthday present. I was born 1/4/1945 and named after Douglas MacArthur - the World War II general.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 16:55, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

70 is an impressive number. When I was younger, I was given a book of quotes and it contained one entry of MacArthur that stuck with me; "I shall set my course to the end that no man need fear to speak the truth." — The Most Comfortable Chair 18:17, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

When It comes to making Good Articles I go by the expression, "I came through and I shall return." I have created 500 Did You Know articles and am returning to the best ones and upgrading those to Good Articles. Check out the records I made as told in the captions of the pictures. As you can see in my list of DYK credits I have done several multiple article hooks. One was for 16 articles in the same hook line and another was for 30 articles in the same hook line. Both these records at the time have since been broken by others.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 18:58, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

• 97% of all the articles I created became a DYK (over a 14 year period). --Doug Coldwell (talk) 22:08, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

There happens to be an audio file on the Benjamin Loxley article which is the one that was an official Did You Know article on Wikipedia's main page 2 days after I created it.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 20:19, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

I am reading your Did You Know entries and they are very interesting. I am hooked. It takes time and a lot of research to write them and you have done some incredible work. I just finished working on my second article for DYK. — The Most Comfortable Chair 10:12, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

That was back in the day when one could borrow Inter-Library Loan hard copy books for references.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 13:07, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing my nomination. I have been meaning to ask you about sources you use. Is there a way to get access to online books and old articles that aren't available for everyone to read? I come across a lot of Google Book entries with snippet previews and I feel it would be very useful if I could access those to get more content. — The Most Comfortable Chair 13:51, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

@The Most Comfortable Chair: Well, that is a "no" and a "yes" at the same time. No, there is no secret place to find "Google Books" other than what you know about already. If it gives you a "Preview" only answer = that's about it for the book! HOWEVER, (there is always a however) there is a source I use extensively that pretty much gives me all the information to put together (or upgrade) an article. That is historical newspapers. You can get a free subscription (worth a couple of hundred bucks) from the Wikipedia Library. All you have to do is ask. If there are subscriptions available (odds are there is) then they will approve your subscription request for the reason you need it. The reason would be that you put together Did You Know articles -AND- Good Articles. You are also a GA reviewer! Just use these items for the reason you are requesting a subscription and they will give you an annual scription for free. When it comes up for renewal in a year, say you want it again and they will renew your subscription. I use newspaper clips extensively now-a-days (that I have been doing for years) since I can't get my hands on real hard copy books from universities. There is so much available in historical newspapers that it's a major source for me -AND- basically you could substitute the news clips for book references. Questions = I probably have an answer along these lines as I have created 500 Did You Know articles as you can see (and have a few trade secrets).--Doug Coldwell (talk) 14:39, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

This last week I have done some major upgrading on the article I created of John Plankinton and used news clip references extensively. So, news clip refs can be a good substitute for actual hard copy library books. I can give you several more examples where I have used news clip refs for an article I created or upgraded. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 14:57, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

BTW, I keep track of my QPQs this way and then I can use them anytime in the future for a potential Did You Know article whenever I create it and nominate it.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 21:06, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

That is helpful, thank you for that. I will check out Wikipedia Library. John Plankinton was a good read and I see your point about old news clips. I have a few topics on my mind that I want to expand, and old news clippings would be perfect for them. By the way, a 97% DYK conversation rate is amazing, especially when you have written so many articles. — The Most Comfortable Chair 07:05, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Louise Bourgeois (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Louise Bourgeois (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:14, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Charles Corydon Hall

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Charles Corydon Hall you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PythonSwarm -- PythonSwarm (talk) 08:01, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Charles_Corydon_Hall

The article Charles_Corydon_Hall you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Charles_Corydon_Hall for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. -- PythonSwarm ^{Talk | Contribs | Global} 08:04, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Charles Corydon Hall

The article Charles Corydon Hall you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Charles Corydon Hall for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PythonSwarm -- PythonSwarm (talk) 08:22, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Charles Corydon Hall

Hi @Doug Coldwell: That is truly chronic. I was thinking of taking over the GA review. I think the previous reviewer is heading for a topic ban:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#User:PythonSwarm and GA_reviews - proposal for topic_ban. I reviewed two big articles recently to GA. This would be 4th review I've done, if your up for it. scope_creep^Talk 23:08, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

User:Scope creep Scotty, Sure! I would be interested in having my article reviewed for GA. Thanks. Michigander --Doug Coldwell (talk) 09:34, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Typographer (typewriter)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Typographer (typewriter) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PythonSwarm -- PythonSwarm (talk) 05:46, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Westinghouse Time Capsules

The article Westinghouse Time Capsules you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Westinghouse Time Capsules for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Example -- Example (talk) 07:21, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nominations

Doug Coldwell, you do a lot of good work on articles at Wikipedia, and you've created well over a thousand of your own. At the moment you have 49 GA nominations, more than twice what the next nearest nominator has, and 1 in 12 of all the current nominations. As such, this is a significant demand on GA reviewing resources. While it's true that all GA nominations should not be made unless the articles that are clearly ready and meet the standards, given the sheer volume you submit, it is important for you to make sure yours do.

Unfortunately, this is not always the case. You have, on a number of occasions, including very recently, nominated articles that have not been checked over prior to nomination—indeed, many of them have not appreciably changed in the years since you originally wrote them. Benjamin Loxley is a prime example: the shape it was in when you first nominated it and I reverted back in August, versus the shape it's in now—it's practically a new article. I thought, after that happened, you would be more careful going forward.

However, I have just today reverted two more of these nominations, both made in the past few days. Once again, I've run into prose that is problematic or sections that are confusing or not well thought out, among other issues. If someone has recently assessed the article as being C class, as was the case with Mary Florence Potts, and you haven't improved it since, it's a pretty good indication that it has a ways to go before it's ready to be nominated. A query to the assessor's talk page would, I'm sure, get their thoughts on what needs improvement without having to take the time of a GA reviewer, and with 494 GANs waiting for review as I type this, there is a clear benefit to holding off nominating articles that are not ready. Please reconsider your approach to nominating going forward, and only nominate articles that clearly meet the criteria. (If you thought these did, then perhaps you should have someone else look over your candidates prior to nominating.) Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:13, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

O.K. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 20:26, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

I was disappointed to see you returning to nominating articles that clearly fail to meet the GA criteria, including one you hadn't edited since 2008, taking you to a total of 54 extant nominations. That is not "O.K."; I will be reverting them. If this behavior continues, there will be a discussion at the GA nominations talk page. The current backlog drive should make no difference to articles being in proper nominating shape, with over 470 still-unreviewed nominations. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:18, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mario Peruzzi

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mario Peruzzi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cairo2k18 -- Cairo2k18 (talk) 05:41, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mario Peruzzi

The article Mario Peruzzi you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mario Peruzzi for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cairo2k18 -- Cairo2k18 (talk) 06:41, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mario Peruzzi

The article Mario Peruzzi you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mario Peruzzi for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cairo2k18 -- Cairo2k18 (talk) 08:22, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Albert P. Halfhill

Hello:

I have completed copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Albert P. Halfhill.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:20, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

William Beanes

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article William Beanes has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

In the "Early life and education" this sentence appears: "Beanes was the third generation of the same name and the fourth generation American." While I have left it as is, I'm not clear what it actually means. This needs to be clarified.

In the "Personal life" section I masked a lot of detail which was really not biographical in my opinion.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:07, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

@Twofingered Typist: I expanded about the generations and hope it is clearer. I also expanded the lead pertaining to the Key poem. I have nominated it as GAN. Thank's for excellent copy edit. FYI, I am also a two fingered typist (never learned how to type conventionally).--Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:15, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

I made a few tweaks to the text. I hope you don't mind. Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:32, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

@Twofingered Typist: Great improvements. Now I see why you are a GOCE Coordinator. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 12:40, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! Best of luck with the article moving forward. I have this picture of Beames being told, "Sorry, can't let you go just yet. We'll drop you off when this bother is over." He and his captors then chat amiably as the battle rages. Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:45, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

He, he, he, he, he - funny! --Doug Coldwell (talk) 12:49, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Automatic scorer

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Automatic scorer you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wasted Time R -- Wasted Time R (talk) 00:01, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Automatic scorer

The article Automatic scorer you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Automatic scorer for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wasted Time R -- Wasted Time R (talk) 00:21, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Dwight (manufacturer)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John Dwight (manufacturer) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 01:22, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of George W. Hotchkiss

The article George W. Hotchkiss you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:George W. Hotchkiss for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wasted Time R -- Wasted Time R (talk) 01:42, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cellarette

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cellarette you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 04:41, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Plankinton

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John Plankinton you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 04:42, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Elizabeth Plankinton House

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Elizabeth Plankinton House you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 04:42, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of William Plankinton

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William Plankinton you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 04:42, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of William Plankinton Mansion

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William Plankinton Mansion you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 04:42, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cellarette

The article Cellarette you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Cellarette for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 06:01, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Elizabeth Plankinton House

The article Elizabeth Plankinton House you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Elizabeth Plankinton House for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 07:41, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Henry Ludington

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Henry Ludington you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 13:41, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Plankinton

The article John Plankinton you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:John Plankinton for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 14:04, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mary Myers

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mary Myers you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Alanna the Brave -- Alanna the Brave (talk) 19:41, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of William Rath

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William Rath you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wasted Time R -- Wasted Time R (talk) 21:42, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Joseph Hobson

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Joseph Hobson you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 22:21, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Typographer (typewriter)

The article Typographer (typewriter) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Typographer (typewriter) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Psi?edelisto -- Psi?edelisto (talk) 23:22, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of William Plankinton Mansion

The article William Plankinton Mansion you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:William Plankinton Mansion for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 14:41, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cellarette

The article Cellarette you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cellarette for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 15:02, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Joseph Hobson

The article Joseph Hobson you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Joseph Hobson for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 18:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of William Plankinton

The article William Plankinton you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:William Plankinton for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 19:22, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Linda Finch

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Linda Finch you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 01:21, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Linda Finch

The article Linda Finch you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Linda Finch for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 10:41, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Plankinton

The article John Plankinton you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:John Plankinton for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 11:22, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Elizabeth Plankinton House

The article Elizabeth Plankinton House you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Elizabeth Plankinton House for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 11:42, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of William Rath

The article William Rath you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:William Rath for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wasted Time R -- Wasted Time R (talk) 13:42, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Joseph Hobson

The article Joseph Hobson you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Joseph Hobson for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 15:25, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Charles T. Pepper

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Charles T. Pepper you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aza24 -- Aza24 (talk) 20:20, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Persis Foster Eames Albee

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Persis Foster Eames Albee you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 09:21, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Eli Parsons Royce

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Eli Parsons Royce you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 09:21, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mary Florence Potts

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mary Florence Potts you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 09:21, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Eli Parsons Royce

The article Eli Parsons Royce you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Eli Parsons Royce for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 10:21, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ludington Public Library

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ludington Public Library you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 13:01, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Persis Foster Eames Albee

The article Persis Foster Eames Albee you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Persis Foster Eames Albee for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 13:41, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mary Florence Potts

The article Mary Florence Potts you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mary Florence Potts for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 15:22, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mary Florence Potts

The article Mary Florence Potts you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mary Florence Potts for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 19:02, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Dwight (manufacturer)

The article John Dwight (manufacturer) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:John Dwight (manufacturer) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 20:42, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of William Beanes

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William Beanes you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 21:21, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nelson Ludington

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nelson Ludington you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 13:21, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of George F. Lewis

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article George F. Lewis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 13:22, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of George F. Lewis

The article George F. Lewis you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:George F. Lewis for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 19:02, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nelson Ludington

The article Nelson Ludington you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Nelson Ludington for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:01, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of William Plankinton Mansion

The article William Plankinton Mansion you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:William Plankinton Mansion for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 20:22, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Jonathon Pratt

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John Jonathon Pratt you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 02:42, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Eli Parsons Royce

The article Eli Parsons Royce you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Eli Parsons Royce for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 12:22, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of George F. Lewis

The article George F. Lewis you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:George F. Lewis for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 12:22, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Albert P. Halfhill

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Albert P. Halfhill you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 15:01, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of William L. Mercereau

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William L. Mercereau you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 15:01, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Albert P. Halfhill

The article Albert P. Halfhill you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Albert P. Halfhill for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 17:21, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of William L. Mercereau

The article William L. Mercereau you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:William L. Mercereau for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 19:01, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Jonathon Pratt

The article John Jonathon Pratt you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:John Jonathon Pratt for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 19:42, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of William Rath

The article William Rath you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:William Rath for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wasted Time R -- Wasted Time R (talk) 21:42, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mary Myers

The article Mary Myers you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mary Myers for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Alanna the Brave -- Alanna the Brave (talk) 00:03, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Albert P. Halfhill

The article Albert P. Halfhill you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Albert P. Halfhill for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 18:02, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Haskell canoe

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Haskell canoe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 13:42, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Haskell canoe

The article Haskell canoe you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Haskell canoe for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 14:21, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Jonathon Pratt

The article John Jonathon Pratt you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:John Jonathon Pratt for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 14:42, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Charles T. Pepper

The article Charles T. Pepper you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Charles T. Pepper for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aza24 -- Aza24 (talk) 22:20, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Haskell canoe

The article Haskell canoe you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Haskell canoe for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 08:02, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Henry Ludington

The article Henry Ludington you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Henry Ludington for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 20:22, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Charles T. Pepper

The article Charles T. Pepper you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Charles T. Pepper for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aza24 -- Aza24 (talk) 22:42, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Persis Foster Eames Albee

The article Persis Foster Eames Albee you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Persis Foster Eames Albee for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 12:02, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nelson Ludington

The article Nelson Ludington you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Nelson Ludington for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 19:42, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Johnson (inventor)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John Johnson (inventor) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Forbes72 -- Forbes72 (talk) 04:41, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Linda Finch

The article Linda Finch you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Linda Finch for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 10:22, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mary Myers

The article Mary Myers you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mary Myers for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Alanna the Brave -- Alanna the Brave (talk) 18:22, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Johnson (inventor)

The article John Johnson (inventor) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:John Johnson (inventor) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Forbes72 -- Forbes72 (talk) 05:42, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

News sources

Aye Doug, long time no 'see'. There's a notice board discussion about the reliability of a Newspaper source I stumbled upon that I thought you might want to look at. — Hope all is well, -- Gwillhickers (talk) 22:07, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Automatic scorer

The article Automatic scorer you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Automatic scorer for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wasted Time R -- Wasted Time R (talk) 01:03, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of William L. Mercereau

The article William L. Mercereau you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:William L. Mercereau for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 13:22, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Merkel Landis

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Merkel Landis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 17:01, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Harv errors

Hi, you reverted two of my edits (here and here) saying that they caused harv errors. I'm a bit confused by this; I don't see any additional error categories when looking at the previous version of the page (and I do have hidden categories enabled), and the pages don't use {{harvnb}} or {{sfn}} so I don't see how I'd break a link used by them. Can you explain my mistake so I don't make it in the future? --Pokechu22 (talk) 18:02, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

@Pokechu22: On my screen one shows this way and another shows this way. So that you can also see Harv Errors get the tool from the Help Desk. They will also give you instructions on how to install the "app" on your computer. Obviously you don't have this tool now, or else you would have seen these immediately and corrected them. Does that help? --Doug Coldwell (talk) 18:49, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Ah, thanks. User:Ucucha/HarvErrors is the tool. It seems the warning message appeared because the page doesn't use {{harvnb}} or {{sfn}} (instead just writing the footnote explicitly without a link, e.g. "Catton, pp. 117-128"), so when I converted to {{cite book}}, there wasn't a link. Prior to April 2020, {{cite book}} didn't automatically work with those templates, but now it does and the tool finds the missing link.

I've redone my edit to A Stillness at Appomattox while also adding {{sfn}}, and redone my edit to Conclusion of the American Civil War with ref=none (I don't want to convert everything there to {{sfn}}).

I'll keep this warning in mind when doing further editing, but I won't worry about it in all cases (e.g. prolation canon has it now, but it's currently lacking footnotes of any kind and the fix there would be to add footnotes, which I'm not prepared to do.) There is an alternate version of the tool (User:Trappist the monk/HarvErrors) that doesn't show the warning if the page doesn't use any kind of harv referencing, which might be useful. --Pokechu22 (talk) 19:58, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

@Pokechu22: Looks good now - no Harv Errors show. Thanks for info. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 20:03, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ludington Public Library

The article Ludington Public Library you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ludington Public Library for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 08:02, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of George Huebner

The article George Huebner you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:George Huebner for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DavidCane -- DavidCane (talk) 16:22, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Merkel Landis

The article Merkel Landis you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Merkel Landis for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 23:01, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Thomas Johnston (engraver)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Thomas Johnston (engraver) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shearonink -- Shearonink (talk) 00:41, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Frank Fowler Loomis

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Frank Fowler Loomis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 03:01, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Frank Fowler Loomis

The article Frank Fowler Loomis you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Frank Fowler Loomis for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 01:21, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Frank Fowler Loomis

The article Frank Fowler Loomis you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Frank Fowler Loomis for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 15:42, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Congrats, it's a...

	GA!
	Congrats on (wow! yet another!) GA - for Thomas Johnston (engraver)! Shearonink (talk) 16:38, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

• @Shearonink: Thanks! It's my 100th Good Article (28th so far this month). --Doug Coldwell (talk) 18:14, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Thomas Johnston (engraver)

The article Thomas Johnston (engraver) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Thomas Johnston (engraver) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shearonink -- Shearonink (talk) 16:42, 23 October 2020 (UTC)