Jump to content

User:Evad37/sandbox/WikiProject Australian Roads/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Assessment
Shortcut
 A department of WikiProject Australian Roads
WikiProject Australian Roads
Project home (WP:AURD)
Talk page (WT:AURD)
Assessment (WP:AURD/A)
Resources (WP:AURD/R)

The Assessment department details how to tag articles of interest to the project banners, and specifies quality and importance guidelines. Anyone may assess articles in accordance with this guideline, with the exception of the featured classes, A-class, and GA-class, as these can only be applied after a successful review at the relevant forum.

Assessment summary

[edit]

information Note: Shown below is the assessment table of WP:HWY/O.
This will be replaced by an Australian Roads specific table once it is created.

Oceania road transport articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
B 1 1
C 1 4 8 5 18
Start 4 22 13 7 46
Stub 48 11 2 61
List 3 2 5
Future 1 1
Category 49 49
Disambig 1 1
Project 4 4
Redirect 6 6
Template 2 2
Assessed 1 11 82 29 62 9 194
Total 1 11 82 29 62 9 194
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 671 Ω = 5.33

Oceania road transport articles by quality log

Tagging articles

[edit]

Articles which are of interest to this project should have the following templates placed at the top of their talk page:

{{WikiProject Australia|class=|importance=|road=yes|road-importance=}}

where
  • |class= the article class (see quality scale below)
  • |importance= the article importance, in relation to WikiProject Australia Importance scale
  • |road-importance= the article importance, in relation to this project (see importance scale below)

{{WikiProject Highways|oceania=yes|class=|importance=}}

where

Quality Scale

[edit]
WikiProject content quality grading scheme
Class Criteria Reader's experience Editing suggestions Example
 FA The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:

A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.

  1. It is:
    1. well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard;
    2. comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
    3. well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate;
    4. neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias;
    5. stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and
    6. compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing.
  2. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of:
    1. a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
    2. appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and
    3. consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.
  3. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly.
  4. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate.
 Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. From WP:USRD:
U.S. Route 41 in Michigan as of 5 December 2010
 FL The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
  1. Prose. It features professional standards of writing.
  2. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
  3. Comprehensiveness.
  4. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities.
  5. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages.
  6. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.
 Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. From WP:USRD:
List of Interstate Highways in Texas as of 4 March 2008
 A The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).
 Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. From WP:USRD:
Interstate 470 (Ohio – West Virginia) as of 3 March 2012
 GA The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations.
More detailed criteria
A good article is:
  1. Well-written:
    1. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
    2. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  2. Verifiable with no original research:
    1. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    2. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);
    3. it contains no original research; and
    4. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    1. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
    2. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    1. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    2. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
 Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. Mitchell Freeway as of 14 March 2013
B The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards.
More detailed criteria
  1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional.
  2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
  3. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
  4. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be of the standard of featured articles. The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
  5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
  6. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.
 Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. Kwinana Freeway as of 18 MArch 2013
C The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.
More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
 Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. Monash Freeway as of 23 March 2013
Start An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.
More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
  • A useful picture or graphic
  • Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
  • A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
  • Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
 Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. Oxley Highway as of 7 March 2013
Stub A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. Carpentaria Highway as of 2 March 2013
List Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. Road infrastructure in Canberra

Additional information

[edit]

The following information applies specifically to road articles:

A-Class criteria: Article has gone through and passed an A-Class Review (at WikiProject Highways)

B-Class criteria: Article is mostly complete and without major issues. Article has:

  • A brief but informative lead section which introduces all the article sections.
  • An infobox
  • A section devoted to describing the route of the road, well-written and referenced.
  • A history into the road, informative, and well-written.
  • A list of the road's junctions.

and is a NPOV, well-written well-referenced article, without trivia that can not be integrated.

C-Class criteria: A substantial article that is not B-Class because:

  • The route description, history, and (major) junctions sections are present; However, one or more of the sections is incomplete, missing sources, or in need of copyediting
  • It contains cleanup banners, such as {{cleanup}}, {{expand article}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}}, or similar
  • It contains large numbers of inline tags, such as {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar

Importance Scale

[edit]

information Note:This is the importance in relation to WikiProject Australian Roads only. See the parent WikiProjects to determine an articles importance in relation to that project.

WikiProject article importance scheme
Importance Criteria Example
 Top Articles of national and international importance. Typically includes articles on systems, rather than individual roads or routes. Highways in Australia
 High Articles of national importance. Typically includes National highways and major interstate routes Princes Highway
 Mid Articles of state or regional importance. Typically includes National Routes, State M-routes and A-routes, urban freeway-standard roads, and highways linking major regoinal centres Mitchell Freeway
 Low Articles of local importance. Great Alpine Road
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Evad37/sandbox/WikiProject_Australian_Roads/Assessment&oldid=679996378"