User talk:148.76.81.130
Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.
Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.
February 2019
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sioux Wars has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sioux Wars was changed by 148.76.81.130 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.869894 on 2019-02-04T16:07:36+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:07, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Battle of the Little Bighorn. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Qzd (talk) 16:10, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Grattan massacre, you may be blocked from editing. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 19:19, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hello, I'm Þjarkur. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bassam Tariq have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. – Þjarkur (talk) 14:03, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hello, I'm Qaei. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to History of the British Raj have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Qaei ☎ 16:39, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
June 2019
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at History of the British Raj. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TwoTwoHello (talk) 16:48, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at History of the British Raj, you may be blocked from editing. TheDoDahMan (talk) 16:48, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at History of the British Raj. TwoTwoHello (talk) 16:52, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
October 2019
[edit]Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Rigoberta Menchú. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Samf4u (talk) 18:21, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:32, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chalupa. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place
{{Help me}}
on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chalupa was changed by 148.76.81.130 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853899 on 2019-11-01T12:46:32+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:46, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
this ip is shared
[edit]idk what fuckd up things the last few ppl did but i'm on a school computer and it says i have new messages 148.76.81.130 (talk) 13:47, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
January 2020
[edit]Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to Category:Industries seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:53, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
January 2020
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sioux Wars has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sioux Wars was changed by 148.76.81.130 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.968592 on 2020-01-29T16:17:01+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:17, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 14:39, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
May 2021
[edit]Hello, I'm Kirbanzo. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to TikTok v. Trump—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 14:29, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to GE Genesis, did not appear constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:55, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
January 2022
[edit]Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Intelligence collection management—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:30, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
February 2022
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chocolate milk. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kleuske (talk) 15:40, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chocolate milk. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jackfork (talk) 15:33, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
March 2022
[edit]Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to 577—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:52, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Sea Cow. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Doug Peltz—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Sea Cow (talk) 13:11, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Doug Peltz. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sea Cow (talk) 13:13, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
May 2022
[edit]Hello, I'm Carpathianflorist. I noticed that you recently removed content from Leonia, New Jersey without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~ carpathianflorist 15:23, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Leonia, New Jersey. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Perfect4th (talk) 15:24, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Simu Liu, you may be blocked from editing. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 17:07, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Simu Liu. -Alabama- (talk) 22:31, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:30, 17 May 2022 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
September 2022
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Internet safety. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — That Coptic Guy (talk) 14:25, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Internet safety, you may be blocked from editing. — That Coptic Guy (talk) 14:26, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Internet safety, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — That Coptic Guy (talk) 14:28, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |