Jump to content

User talk:190.104.232.132

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Static IP address

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your host, static.132.232.104.190.cps.com.ar (190.104.232.132), is registered to CPS and is believed to be a static address used by only one connection. However, this IP address may represent more than one user, accessing the Internet via several personal computers or devices.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.

If vandalism is noted from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

December 2015

Hello, I'm BarrelProof. I noticed that you recently removed some content from ResearchGate without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —BarrelProof (talk) 17:11, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, I'm Amortias. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Nova Science Publishers without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Amortias (T)(C) 18:20, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edits to User:Amortias could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Marianna251TALK 18:26, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Nova Science Publishers. Bbb23 (talk) 16:03, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2016

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Nova Science Publishers have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 19:08, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Talk:Nova Science Publishers, you may be blocked from editing. Randykitty (talk) 16:32, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Legal threats at Nova Science Publishers

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Legal_threats_at_Nova_Science_Publishers regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 16:55, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Maximiliano Korstanje has been reverted.
Your edit here to Maximiliano Korstanje was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://unesciudadbolivar.blogspot.com.ar/2016/11/algunos-autores-que-hablan-sobre-la.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

November 2017

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:25, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Maximiliano Korstanje

Your first edit summary there said "helping," which of course tells me nothing at all about the actual substance of your edit. Your second edit summary says "EDITING AGAIN WHAT IS POUR ENGLISH," which itself has two grammatical errors, a spelling error, incorrect capitalization, and a possible attack. That's not to point out that your changes are, as I said, poorly written.

The change from "written" to "widely published" makes no sense. What was wrong with the version you changed?

The sentence about his status as a "Visiting Professor" had incorrect capitalization and wasn't sourced.

The sentence that started "In sharp contrast" contained the obsolete terms "lay-citizens" and "vulnerated" and its citation is incorrectly formatted.

The sentence that started "In 2017" contained several grammatical errors. Both that and the ensuing sentence are possible WP:PROMO violations.

The sentence that started "Last but not least" is not sourced and has at least two instances of bad writing per WP:PEACOCK.

The sentence that started "He was notably" is a problem with WP:PRIMARY.

Please do not keep adding this text. Almost every word of it violates a policy or guideline. CityOfSilver 19:41, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Your recent editing history at Maximiliano Korstanje shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CityOfSilver 19:51, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, 190.104.232.132. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Terrorism, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. So, if in the future you want to edit from an IP originating in the city where you teach and want to spam your research here on wiki, remember that Wikipedia will punish the hell out of such vain promotionalism. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:19, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2018

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Guy (Help!) 10:05, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Reasons for block:

Promotional editing, adding WP:REFSPAM to Maximiliano Korstanje (IP address geolocates to subject's location and edits suggest a close connection).
Disruptive editing, adding all-capitalised meta-commentary to mainspace which also strongly suggest that this IP is, or is closely associated with, Korstanje.
The entire editing history of this IP is indicative of strong POV aggressively pushed (e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nova_Science_Publishers&diff=prev&oldid=740686385).

If this was a named account, it would probably be a banning issue by now. Guy (Help!) 10:11, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Working in Wikipedia

Am leaving this message at the following user talk pages:

I don't know if what a person wrote from the 190' IP address here is true or not -- namely We are part of an university project which aims to improve the content of wikipedia filling the gaps with information. We are students and academicians and experts in the field we are participating. -- but the way you are behaving is unacceptable in Wikipedia.

This community is governed by its policies and guidelines, which the community itself put in place over the past sixteen years. You are ignoring these community norms.

We do not care who you say you are or what expertise you claim. What we care about is content and behavior, and neither the content you are adding nor your behavior is even close to acceptable here.

Please stop trying to force content into Wikipedia about Maximiliano Korstanje and instead ask questions and try to learn how Wikipedia works. Please edit only through one named account. The Noellesch9 account is the oldest one that I can see and that account is blocked. Everything you are doing is what we call block evasion. Please stop, and work through the Noellesch9 account to get unblocked before doing anything further. To get unblocked you will need to demonstrate that you understand that you cannot create sockpuppets, cannot try to force content into WP by edit warring by editing while logged out or creating yet more accounts, and that you will try to learn and follow the policies and guidelines. Jytdog (talk) 17:44, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the note above. Jytdog (talk) 14:44, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 17:52, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Bishonen | talk 18:22, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:190.104.232.132&oldid=1142809047"

Hidden category:

Static IP addresses used by Wikipedia users