User talk:209.52.88.191

October 2015

Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to Penticton Secondary School seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:53, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2018

Hello, I'm Donner60. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Christ (title)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:08, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Air Canada, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Nfalceso | Reply Here 03:11, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Gift, you may be blocked from editing. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:31, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Copyright. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:32, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:32, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

209.52.88.191 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Vandals left IP permanently. Good editors permanently joined. Wrongly blocked. WHAT?!!?!

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQL ^{Query me!} 03:36, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

209.52.88.191 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have understood what I have been blocked for, will not continue to cause damage or disruption and will make useful contributions instead. 209.52.88.191 (talk) 03:37, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

When you lie once, it is harder to believe what you say the next time. You will need to do more than simply tell us a general statement you got from the previous unblock request; to be unblocked early, you will need to specifically state what you did wrong, what steps you will take to not do it again, and what articles or topic areas you intend to edit in. As such, I am declining this request. 331dot (talk) 09:34, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So, first you say you didn't do it "Vandals left IP permanently", now you say you did it, but will stop. Which is the truth, which is a lie, and why should I believe either? SQL ^{Query me!} 03:42, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, the second one was the truth. The first one is a lie. And the reason is the first one was fake and added by me. 209.52.88.191 (talk) 03:44, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Copyright (May 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

It appears that your submission is either an attempt to be humorous rather than factual, or is an obvious hoax. As Wikipedia strives to contain only factual entries, we can not accept your submission at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Copyright and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Copyright, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:44, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 209.52.88.191! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 04:44, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hello, I'm Red Phoenix. An edit you recently made to Conjunctiva seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Red Phoenix ^talk 01:45, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello, I'm Fehufanga. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Cyberpunk (role-playing game) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. --

Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 02:42, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mike Bickle (minister) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mike Bickle (minister) was changed by 209.52.88.191 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861752 on 2024-02-09T02:31:49+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.