User talk:216.163.254.4

February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Talk:A Midsummer Night's Dream has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Ixfd64 (talk) 01:39, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to A Midsummer Night's Dream constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 01:39, 7 February 2008 (UTC))

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Scotty Cameron do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.-- The Red Pen of Doom 20:39, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

December 2012

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Telaga, without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:19, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

August 2018

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Vinoba Bhave— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk or my talk page. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 10:14, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2019

Hello, I'm Count Count. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to 1961 Goldsboro B-52 crash— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Count Count (talk) 18:27, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Jenny McCarthy, you may be blocked from editing. --Guy Macon (talk) 20:45, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

-Guy Macon (talk) 20:45, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

---