User talk:301fieriw

Welcome!

Hi 301fieriw! I noticed your contributions to Beam (music) and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! StereoFolic (talk) 16:24, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Johannes Quack (organist)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Johannes Quack (organist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Annh07 (talk) 15:07, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SoundSlice

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, SoundSlice, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 14:40, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: Wikipedia articles are meant to be encyclopedic entries, and not merely an external link. -- Whpq (talk) 15:02, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Soundslice

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Soundslice, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:E88E:98F:D488:76CE (talk) 05:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello, I'm Intforce. I noticed that you recently removed content from Nocturnes (Chopin) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. intforce (talk) 16:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotect this page so I can edit it. I wanted to replace every incipit image with scorewriter-quality images. 301fieriw (talk) 13:31, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

301fieriw (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wanted to edit. I am a beginner at editing. 301fieriw (talk) 05:38, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 08:52, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note - I have restored the declined unblock request. You may not remove that while you are still blocked. -- Whpq (talk) 15:34, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

301fieriw (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The mistake I made was disruptive editing. I promise that I will no longer do any mistake while editing. I will make acceptable edits. 301fieriw (talk) 08:22, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is generic unblock request that could apply to anyone. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:59, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

301fieriw (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block is no longer necessary. It's been a long time since I have been blocked. 301fieriw (talk) 16:01, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In your next unblock request, you should say what you did wrong, what you will do instead of repeatting your mistakes, and what edits you want to make, if unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 18:03, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock discussion

Please describe clearly and concisely how your editing was disruptive, what you would do different, and what constructive edits you would make. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:34, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

301fieriw (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It's been a long time since I have been blocked. The block is no longer necessary. Not only pages I've tried to create speedily deleted, my bad edits demonstrated unfathomable levels of arrogance. Instead of making those bad edits, I will think before making an edit. When unblocked, I will correct spelling and grammar mistakes. I will also add extra detail for clarity to stub articles. I promise to make good edits, like those which understand the point of things. I may try to understand things. I will ask nicely about something in a Wikipedia article which is difficult to understand. And when the person who created or last edited the article tells me, I will edit the article to make it simple. Please unblock me. For example, when an article says 'friut', I will make it 'fruit'. 301fieriw (talk) 06:07, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:19, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

301fieriw, can you provide an example of the kind of edit you want to make? I'm concerned that many of the edits that you made prior to getting blocked seemed to not understand the point of things like {{music}}. It's not that I think you intend to cause problems, but I worry you may do so inadvertently because you don't understand things and don't stop to ask. (I'm also not sure what you were doing with posts like this: Talk:Tenjiku_shogi#Mnemonic_device_piece_set.) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:14, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- If this edit was intended as a response to my question, it's not a reassuring one, unfortunately. It does not answer my question and raises questions about your ability to understand the project well enough to edit it responsibly. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

301fieriw (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It's been a long time since I have been blocked. The block is no longer necessary. Not only pages I've tried to create speedily deleted, my bad edits demonstrated unfathomable levels of arrogance. Instead of making those bad edits, I will think before making an edit. When unblocked, I will correct spelling and grammar mistakes. I will also add extra detail for clarity to stub articles. I promise to make good edits, like those which understand the point of things. I may try to understand things. I will ask nicely about something in a Wikipedia article which is difficult to understand. And when the person who created or last edited the article tells me, I will edit the article to make it simple. Please unblock me. For example, if an article says "friut", I will make it "fruit". 301fieriw (talk) 15:50, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. You already have an open unblock request. If that's insufficiently convincing for any admin to take action, you should edit that unblock request rather than posting a second, simultaneous, unblock request. Yamla (talk) 11:50, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.