Jump to content

User talk:82.43.21.215/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Great Expectations has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tommy2010 13:24, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Regancy42 (talk) 13:24, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Great Expectations. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Tommy2010 13:25, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Great Expectations. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Orphan Wiki 13:27, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 13:38, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Anaerobic digestion has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Anna Lincoln 09:26, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Anaerobic digestion. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Anna Lincoln 09:27, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Sustainability. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Anna Lincoln 09:32, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Sustainability. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Anna Lincoln 09:33, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:36, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Philippe Starck has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Calmer Waters 09:09, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Aston Villa F.C. has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Happysailor (Talk) 13:42, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bull Ring, Birmingham. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Bull Ring, Birmingham. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 13:45, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Bull Ring, Birmingham. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Happysailor (Talk) 13:47, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

JamesBWatson (talk) 14:08, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Q3 Academy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:51, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Q3 Academy. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:53, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with your recent edit to Claw hammer, you will be blocked from editing.

Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted by DASHBot.

  • DASHBot produces few false positives, but they do happen. If you believe the bot has reverted your edit wrongly, it is helpful if you report the error so the bot does not make the same mistake again. Please:

Thanks, DASHBot Anti-Vandalism (talk) 11:23, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Claw hammer. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:25, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Closedmouth (talk) 11:32, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Email, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

January 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Profumo Affair, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Profumo Affair. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. DVdm (talk) 13:44, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Profumo Affair. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DVdm (talk) 13:46, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Profumo Affair. DVdm (talk) 13:46, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for Vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so when the block expires. If you feel this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Amalthea 13:54, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry.

[edit]

I personally apologize for the vandalism from this IP, as it is a school IP.

July 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Child poverty, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

October 2011

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Brochureware, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brochureware with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Velella  Velella Talk   08:56, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Reception theory with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Anirudh Emani (talk) 09:42, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Database, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

May 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Timeline of artificial satellites and space probes, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

May 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Defence of the Realm Act 1914, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of the Somme. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bruce Almighty. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Ankh.Morpork 14:39, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chronology of the universe, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Root. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Root was changed by 82.43.21.215 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953284 on 2012-05-24T13:37:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:37, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Series and parallel circuits, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:82.43.21.215/Archive_1&oldid=1142822664"