User talk:Acbraughlerauthor

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Hello, Acbraughlerauthor, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to CGP Grey seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — crh ₂₃ (Talk) 15:48, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015[edit]

Hello, my name is Donald Trump and I approve this message: I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Autonomous car because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lklundin (talk) 20:49, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. Please consider submitting to Wikipedia:Requested articles instead. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Acbraughlerauthor/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 22:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Acbraughlerauthor, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 22:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Secular Talk[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Secular Talk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --Non-Dropframe _talk 21:37, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Déjà vu has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Déjà vu was changed by Acbraughlerauthor (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.890289 on 2016-05-02T20:27:07+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:27, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at King of Hanover. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Bamyers99 (talk) 18:32, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User:Bamyers99, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:13, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for harassing other users, as you did at User:Bamyers99. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:14, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Acbraughlerauthor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe my account has been stolen by a friend. I told him the username and password in good faith and proceeded to go about disrupting other Wikipedia pages. I don't know what to do, and now I have been blocked.

Decline reason:

Sorry, but sharing accounts and passwords is not allowed on Wikipedia per our username policy on sharing accounts. All user accounts must both represent only one individual, and be used by only one individual. Since you admitted sharing this account, it must now be indefinitely blocked. Feel free to create a new account that meets our username policy, and don't share it with others :-). ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:20, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]