User talk:Adma2618

This is Adma2618's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adamburg (micronation) (January 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:

It appears that your submission is either an attempt to be humorous rather than factual, or is an obvious hoax. As Wikipedia strives to contain only factual entries, we can not accept your submission at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adamburg (micronation) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Adamburg (micronation), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KJP1 (talk) 23:36, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adamburg article back to draft

I have sent the draft you created back to draft space as Draft:Adamburg (micronation). It is not ready for an article yet. It falls so short of article standards that it qualifies for speedy deletion. Rather than delete the article, I'm willing to leave it in draft space. However, if you move it back to article space again, I will delete it to preserve the integrity of the encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 01:44, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Adamburg (micronation)

A tag has been placed on Draft:Adamburg (micronation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:39, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Adamburg

The article Adamburg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems to be obviously made-up by the creator of the article, per this diff; and quite implausible claim of significance. If the author can't provide reliable sources that pass the threshold of notability, then this should be deleted, just like the the similar draft that was deleted a few days ago

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lourdes 03:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Images (2).png

Thanks for uploading File:Images (2).png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 03:45, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Adamburg

Hello Adma2618,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Adamburg for deletion because the article appears to be about something that you or someone you know personally invented, coined, or discovered, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important—that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Adamburg

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Adamburg, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lourdes 12:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Adamburg, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Lourdes 12:13, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

'Every time you delete this page, I will just keep coming back again and again...'

You may be blocked if you continue to create the page without content.Xx236 (talk) 12:16, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Adamburg

Hello Adma2618,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Adamburg for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Shellwood (talk) 15:33, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself. Shellwood (talk) 15:43, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, you have been. Deb (talk) 16:00, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Adma2618, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 14:41, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]