User talk:Ajpfrgvcc
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Ajpfrgvcc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 13:49, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Recent edit to Battle of Sammel
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Battle of Sammel, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 13:45, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
October 2019
[edit] Hello, I'm Flix11. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ranthambore Fort have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Flix11 (talk) 13:49, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Ajpfrgvcc, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Ajpfrgvcc! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:06, 4 October 2019 (UTC) |
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Khanwa. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Battle of Khanwa was changed by Ajpfrgvcc (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864839 on 2019-10-05T03:47:29+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:47, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
October 2019
[edit]
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Battle of Khanwa. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 04:25, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
March 2020
[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Khanwa. Alivardi (talk) 19:03, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.