User talk:Ajweberman
October 2007
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Jewish Defense Organization. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as the text has been restored from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tiptoety 01:31, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
- Hi. Statements such as, "This is a falsehood..." violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view and original research policies. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 17:44, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:Ivins.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Ivins.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:17, 1 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Navy Blue formerly iDosh 19:17, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Ivins.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading Image:Ivins.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — Navy Blue formerly iDosh 19:17, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:Image-Ivins.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Image-Ivins.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:17, 1 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Navy Blue formerly iDosh 19:17, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Image-Ivins.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading Image:Image-Ivins.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — Navy Blue formerly iDosh 19:17, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Image:Image-Ivins.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Image:Image-Ivins.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Image-Ivins.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Q T C 12:42, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
I've reverted your copying of the A. J. Weberman article to the AJ disambiguation article. Please don't do it again -- you're not the only AJ in the Wikipedia. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 19:44, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Dylanology
[edit]This sort of thing is inappropriate.[1] I won't remove it, but please don't do it again. Will Beback talk 05:32, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Possible conflict of interest
[edit]If you are the subject of the article bearing a name similar to yours, please read this:
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.
Dougweller (talk) 20:39, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
- Your recent edits to A. J. Weberman don't meet Wikipedia standards. This project has strict requirements for what we say about living people, which obviously includes yourself and also your living colleagues, opponents, etc. If you have issues with the biography the best places to raise those would be at the article talk page, talk:A. J. Weberman, or the biopgraphies noticeboard, WP:BLPN. The latter would get the widest input. I suggest you look around at other biographies to see how they're put together. Will Beback talk 20:44, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
March 2013
[edit]
Hello, Ajweberman. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Tempest (Bob Dylan album), you should consider our guidance on Conflicts of interest and take a look at the Plain and simple conflict of interest guide.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 03:49, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
March 2017
[edit] If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Emmett Till, you may be blocked from editing. I'm referring to this edit: link. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:32, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
My assertion that Emmett Till sexually assaulted his victim was based on court testimony given under oath. The transcript was reproduced by a distinguished University.[1] According to her it was not wolf whistling or ogling. She gave detailed testimony that she was sexually assaulted by Till who weighed 195 lbs. This is a case of PC and twisting history. The victim had no ulterior motive to concoct this story as most of her customers were black.
Q Just tell the Court what happened there at that time, please, ma'am.
A This nigger man came in the store and he stopped there at the candy case.
Q Now, is the store, with reference to that candy counter, is there anything back of the candy counter towards the wall of the Store?
A No.
Q Is there any place to walk there or anything of that sort? A Yes, an aisle. Q When this negro man came in the store, where were you in the store?
A I was farther back in the store, behind the counter.
Q And when he came in, I believe you said he• stopped in front of the candy counter, is that right?
A Yes.
Q And what did you do then?
A I walked up to the candy counter.
Q And what transpired up there at the candy counter?
A I asked him what he wanted…I got it and put it on top of the candy case. I held my right hand out for his money.
Q Will you show the Court how you held 'your hand out?
A I held out my hand like this (demonstrating by holding out her hand).
Q And did he give you the money?
A No.
Q What did he do?
A He caught my hand. Q Will you show the Court just how he grasped your
A Like this (demonstrating with her hand).
Q By what you have shown us, he held your hand by grasping all the fingers in the palm of his hand, is that it?
A Yes.
Q And was that a strong grip or a light grip that he had when he held your hand?
A A strong grip.
Q And will you show the court what you did? How did you get loose?
A Well, I just jerked it loose, like this (demonstrating).
Q It was about that difficult to get loose, was it?
A Yes.
Q And it was with that much difficulty that you gotyour hand loose?
A Yes.
Q Just what did he say when he grabbed your hand?
A He said, "How about a date, baby? Q When you freed yourself, what happened then?
A I turned around and started back to the back of the store .
Q You did what?
A I turned to get to the back of the store.
Q Did you do anything further then?
A Yes. He came on down that way and he caught me at the cash register.
Q You say he caught you?
A Yes ..
Q How did he catch you?
A Well, he put his left hand on my waist, and he put his other hand over on the other side.
Q How were you going down along the counter there? Did he approach you from the front, or from the rear or how?
A From the side.
Q Now, Mrs. Bryant, will you stand up and put my hands just where he grasped you? Will you show the Court and jury? A lt was like this (demonstrating by putting Mr. Carlton's hands on her body).
Q He grabbed you like that, did he?
A Yes.
Q In other words, with his left arm around your back?
A Yes.
Q And his left hand on you left hip?
A Yes.
Q And he had his right hand on your right hip?
A Yes.
Q Did he say anything to you then at the time he grabbed you there by the cash register?
A Yes.
Q What did he say?
A He said, "What's •the matter, baby? Can't you take it ? 11
Q He said, "What's the matter, baby?
A Yes.
Q Did you then try to free yourself?
A Yes.
Q was it difficult? Did you succeed?
A Yes.
Q Did he say anything further to you?
A Yes.
Q What did he say?
A He said, "You needn't be afraid of me
Q And did he then use language chat you don't use?
A Yes.
Q can you tell the court just what letter that word begins begins with?
A (The witness did not answer verbally, but shook her head negatively.)
Q In other words, it is an unprintable word?
A Yes.
Q Did he say anything after that one unprintable word? A Yes.
Q And what was that?
A Well, he said well "With white women before."
Q When you were able to free yourself from him, what did you do then?
A Then this other nigger came in the store and got him by the arm.
Q And what happened then?
A And then he told him to come on and let’s go.
Q Did he leave the store willingly or unwillingly?
A Unwillingly.
Q How did the other negro get out of the store then? How did they leave?
A He had him by the arm and led him out.
Q Were there any white men in the store at the time this occurred?
A No,
Q Were there any other negro men in the store at the time?
A No.
Q Were there any other persons outside the store?
A Yes.
Q Were they white men or colored men?
A Colored.
Q Were there a number of them out there? How many of them were out there?
A Oh, about eight or nine.
Q When he went out the door, did he say anything further after he had made these obscene remarks?
A Yes. He turned around and said, "Good-by."
Q And when he got out the door, what did you do? A 1 called• to Mrs. Milam to watch me and then l ran out the door to go to the car.
Q Which car did you go to?
A Mrs. Milam's.
Q What did you go to the car for?
A For my pistol.
Q Where was your pistol in the •car?
A Under the seat.
Q It was under which seat?
A The driver's seat.
Q As you went out the door and went to the car, did you see this man again?
A Yes.
Q Where was he then? Where was he standing?
A He was standing by one of the posts on the front porch.
Q Your store has a front porch to it?
A Yes.
Q And these posts are on the front porch?
A Yes.
Q Did he say or do anything at that time?
A. He whistled and then came out in the road;
Q Can you give a sound something like the whistle that he made there? Was it something like this? (Mr. Carlton demonstrated by giving two low whistles.)
A Yes.
Q When you got your pistol, Mrs. Bryant, where was this boy then? Or l should say where was this man?
A When I turned around, he was getting in a car down the road.
Q Did you rush back in the store then?
A Yes.
Q Had you ever seen that man before?.
A. No.
Q Have you ever seen him since?
A. No. Q Tell us what size man he was. Describe about how tall he was.
A. He was• about five feet, six inches tall.
Q And that is about four inches taller than you are, is that right?
A Yes.
Q And how much would you say that he weighed?
A Around one hundred and fifty pounds.
Q What sort of impression did this occurrence make
A I was just scared to death.
Q Mrs. Bryant, do you generally know the negroes in that community around Money? A Yes.
Q What kind of store is it that you run there?
A Just a general store.
Q Are most of your customers negroes or white people?
A Most of them are negroes.
Q And of course, you come in contact with most of the negroes around there in that way?
A Yes.
Q And you know most of them around there, do you?
A Yes.
Q And was this man one of those? A No.
Q Did he talk with a southern or northern brogue?
A The northern brogue.
Hi AJ, I'm a big fan of you! <3
[edit]Loved your book "Coup D'etat in America" but please don't revert what I deleted, come up with something better, better references. Love to expand more on Coup D'etat in America. Raquel Baranow (talk) 00:11, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Ajweberman. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Ajweberman. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
January 2019
[edit] Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to QAnon, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bennv3771 (talk) 04:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
February 2022
[edit]
This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Do not add links (especially to unofficial sites; and even more so when said sites are clearly attack pages under an imposter address) which are gross BLP violations RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:12, 8 February 2022 (UTC)