User talk:Ar558
Chart
[edit]I just wanted to tell you that the chart you uploaded (:File:Chart1.gif) is nice, and updated, but it has an error. Till the late 20s, the times were measured only to the one-fifth of a second (0.2s), rather than one tenth (0.1s). So, the marks on the chart showing 10.6 and 10.4 records should be 0.2s wide, not 0.1 as you made. Hope you can change this. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:20, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
The article Joshua Hill (racing driver) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. WWGB (talk) 12:14, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
The article Joshua Hill (racing driver) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:BIO. Very notable family, but he has not received sufficient attention for himself yet.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 13:01, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
1992 points tables
[edit]Hi Ar558. Thanks for the "standings after the race" tables you added to the 1992 Formula One race report articles. A couple of minor points in case you're planning to do any more:
- Benetton were entered as a British team until 1996, and
- the Constructors' points should be right-aligned, similar to the Drivers' points.
But apart from that, great work! Thanks. DH85868993 (talk) 03:17, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
P.S. If you are interested in contributing to Formula One articles, you may be interested in joining the Formula One WikiProject. DH85868993 (talk) 03:19, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Silverstone
[edit]On the TV show Fifth Gear Jason Plato set a lap record of 2:22.14 for a production car on the new Arena layout in a Noble M600. Pretty sure Formula One has the lap record. Any sections titled lap record should discuss the official lap records and any tivial TV show records should be either minor footnotes, or not covered at all as they are of trivial importance. --Falcadore (talk) 11:21, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Why are you partially updating articles? Please edit properly next time
[edit]I noticed the edits you made today to Didier Cuche. Why would you add today's DH win to the list, but not even attempt to update all the other necessary items too? Things like the total number of wins, podiums, etc, everything that needed to be fixed in this subsequent edit. If you're going to make an edit, then you should make a complete and useful edit, not a partial incomplete edit that someone else needs to fix a few minutes later. And even worse, at the time you made the edits, the race was not even completed yet and so Cuche was not officially the winner yet. Someone else could have come from the high start numbers and won that race.
Please try to do a more thorough job in the future, otherwise just leave the article alone, and let someone else do the entire update. And do not update articles at all until the event in question has been officially completed. Thanks. --Seattle Skier (talk) 13:44, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
July 2012
[edit]
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Alexander Ovechkin. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 02:48, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 2 November
[edit] Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the 2014 United States Grand Prix page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:45, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
June 2016
[edit]
Hello, I'm Qed237. An edit that you recently made to UEFA Euro 2016 seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Qed237 (talk) 21:26, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
David Cameron
[edit]He's still a politician, even if he's no longer in office. I think if you look through other past Prime Ministers and party leaders who are no longer in office you'll find they're still described as politicians rather than former politicians. This is Paul (talk) 21:17, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Ar558. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Comparison with teammates
[edit]Please stop adding these tables to various articles, because that is against the consensus of the WP:FORMULA1. – Sabbatino (talk) 19:41, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Lewis Hamilton shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Kahastok talk 19:47, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
Mjroots (talk) 20:12, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Ar558. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 12
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Black helicopter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Carter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Ar558. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Ar558. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)