User talk:ArchitectureZMJ

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, ArchitectureZMJ! Thank you for your contributions. I am Jaaron95 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! JAaron95 ^Talk 14:55, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, ArchitectureZMJ. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. JAaron95 ^Talk 14:55, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BuckleyGrayYeoman (January 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BuckleyGrayYeoman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:35, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! ArchitectureZMJ, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:35, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

!helper hi thanks for your message. I do think it would be great to have all the UK practice on Wikipedia and this one, BuckleyGrayYeoman, deserves one page as they are listed in the AJ/100 best practice. I will try to add some more sources then from publications. Thanks

!helper hi I did yesterday add lots of varied sources from publications. I also tried to be very objective in the text, Let me know your thoughts. Thanks

Your submission at Articles for creation: BuckleyGrayYeoman (January 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

Nothing here tells me anything interesting about the company. What makes it noteworthy? A long list of projects is neither encyclopedic nor interesting reading. Do not use as references director listings, company listings in trade magazines, or anything else that is just factual proof that the company exists. To be notable, there have to be substantial, published articles about the company.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BuckleyGrayYeoman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 01:27, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your help. I am struggling to understand as BuckleyGrayYeoman is a UK architectural practice such as Assael, Jestico + Whiles, Eric Parry, Stanton Williams, Patel Taylor and many others that are ranked in the best 100 architecture practice in the UK. They all have wikipedia pages where lots of them are listing their projects. I will rework on the draft then following your advices regarding listing and keep only substantial published articles. Thanks again.

Your submission at Articles for creation: BuckleyGrayYeoman (January 28)[edit]

Hi, I reviewed my article since then but I had no feedback. Do you know how does it work in that case? would you be able to have a look at it again and let me know if you think it s now in line with Wikipedia's policy ? Thanks a lot for your help

Your submission at Articles for creation: BuckleyGrayYeoman (February 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BuckleyGrayYeoman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:02, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BuckleyGrayYeoman (March 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

Still needs any further available in-depth third-party sources overall.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BuckleyGrayYeoman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 07:32, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:BuckleyGrayYeoman has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:BuckleyGrayYeoman. Thanks! Worldbruce (talk) 17:44, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BuckleyGrayYeoman (November 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Something I should've noted with my past reviewing is that we cannot accept sources such as interviews, press releases, trivial passing mentions, news about funding, company activities, partnerships or financing, simply because these would not be independent. Hence, focusing with only actual independent news would help; from what I see, it simply seems too soon for this company since everything listed is simply trivial and unconvincing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BuckleyGrayYeoman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:18, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017[edit]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:BuckleyGrayYeoman a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:02, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want the page to be moved to that title, just ask! You can almost certainly do it yourself anyway. By the way, I see that you've edited more or less nothing but this page. Do you have some connection with the company? If so, you are obliged to declare it. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BuckleyGrayYeoman has been accepted[edit]

BuckleyGrayYeoman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:21, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, ArchitectureZMJ. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article BuckleyGrayYeoman, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:48, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to The Goodsyard because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 09:14, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]