User talk:Autorko

This is Autorko's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Memgraph (March 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Memgraph and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Memgraph, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 17:52, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Autorko! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 17:52, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liance, thank you for your feedback regarding Memgraph. I've updated the draft with new sources: scientific papers, conference proceedings, etc. I hope that this is now up to Wikipedia standard :) Autorko (talk) 09:04, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Business Source License

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Business Source License requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://mariadb.com/bsl-faq-adopting/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:04, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Praxidicae! Thank you for your feedback and tips. I've left ma comment on the page. Autorko (talk) 06:54, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Memgraph (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Memgraph instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Memgraph and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Memgraph, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:43, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Memgraph

Hello Autorko! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Memgraph, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from db-engines.com/en/system/Memgraph, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Memgraph and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Memgraph, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Memgraph. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Memgraph with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Memgraph saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:58, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robert!

Thank you for the tips. I've taken a look at the part that has been marked as the one breaching the copyright. It is this sentence "Memgraph supports data ingestion from sources like Kafka, SQL, or plain CSV files. It provides a standard interface to query data with openCypher, a widely-used and declarative query language that is easy to write, understand and optimize for performance. This is achieved by using the property graph data model, which stores data in terms of objects, their attributes, and the relationships that connect them". I've create that info from text on Memgraph System Properties page and that page was cited as source. This wasn't a direct copy paste or even some compilation of sentences from that site as you can see. If this part gets deleted from the article I'll try to find other sources on Google Scholar and other notable sources to update the article. St the moment there is warring on the article not to touch that part. Autorko (talk) 06:49, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Memgraph. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:37, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thank you for pointers. I've moved the page. Autorko (talk) 11:41, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And I've undone that move – there's no point moving it to mainspace while the copyright problem remains unresolved (you should not edit it either). If you want to rewrite the page without the copyvios you can do so here; please don't copy text from the present version, as that may make your rewrite unusable. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:11, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Autorko - The draft has a template on it saying, "do not blank, merge, or move it, or remove this notice, while the discussion is in progress." That meant not to move it while the MFD was in process. Why did you think that didn't apply to you? If it says, "do not ... move it", that means do not move it. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:58, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You moved a page having very little visible text, because the text is largely hidden by a copyvio notice, into article space. Article space is not intended for hidden copyright-violating stuff. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:58, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused. I was told to move it. As far. Then the move was undone. Was I supposed to move the one from main space to Draft space? Did I get the direction wrong?

In order not to repeat the same mistake again can you User:Robert_McClenon and User:Justlettersandnumbers tell me on which draft should I make changes? I can see two possible places:

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Memgraph

2. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Memgraph/Temp&action=edit&redlink=1.

On the draft page (onw with number 1) it says "Do not restore or edit the blanked content on this page until the issue is resolved by an administrator, copyright clerk or VRT agent.", to me it means that I'm not allowed to update the content that is not visible at the moment. And that draf is also pending for deletion.

Number 2 looks like a brand new page. I guess that the parent page for that Talk page no longer exists.

So I would go with updating Number 1.

Here is my plan:

1. Take a look at exiting draft located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Memgraph

2. Resolve reported copyright issues

3. Notify you about the steps that I've done

Is this the right workflow? Autorko (talk) 05:58, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm sorry, Autorko, it isn't – you were right when you wrote higher up "it means that I'm not allowed to update the content that is not visible at the moment". You should not edit Draft:Memgraph until and unless the copyright problem has been resolved. As I said above, you may if you wish start a copyvio-free rewrite at this temporary page, making quite sure that you do not copy any compromised text from the present version, as that may make your rewrite unusable; it's OK to copy the references, infobox, categories and so on, just not the running text. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 07:47, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. I'll do it like that. I just need to find time to seat down and focus. Thanks for the help! Autorko (talk) 10:52, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Autorko. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Memgraph, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:22, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you User:Robert_McClenon. I don't think that I'm in COI, But it is better to be safe than sorry :) When I'll update this article I'll add a code at the top of the talk page for the topic that I'm open source contributor to related project. This is not exactly Memgraph, but one their other open source software. Autorko (talk) 07:59, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello. Your recent edit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 12:50, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]