User talk:B!ttu

B!ttu, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi B!ttu! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Greetings...

Hello, B!ttu, and welcome to Wikipedia!

To get started, click on the green welcome.

I hope you like it here and decide to stay!

Happy editing! Sophus Bie ^(talk) 13:13, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. You might want to place Template:User_page at the top of your userpage, as otherwise some editors might give you a hard time about the userpage policy, Wikipedia:Userpage#Pages_that_look_like_articles.2C_copy_pages.2C_project_pages. Sophus Bie ^(talk) 13:13, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (i make new wikipedia with new username) --JunhoKang 17:55, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	i liove it Kangjunho (talk) 19:08, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm Epicgenius. The page User:B!ttu appears to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Epicgenius (talk) 20:56, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Real Life Barnstar
	im a famous model in my city. fans need to kinow more about me ^^ B!ttu (talk) 19:36, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kang Jun Ho

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kang Jun Ho requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. GILO A&E⇑ 12:40, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kang Jun Ho for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kang Jun Ho is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kang Jun Ho until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Slashme (talk) 16:52, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Kang Jun Ho, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. GILO A&E⇑ 17:42, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Kang Jun Ho, you may be blocked from editing. This is the second time you've removed tags which specifically state that you should not remove them. Please stop. Slashme (talk) 19:26, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Kang Jun Ho, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. GILO A&E⇑ 17:42, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Kang Jun Ho, you may be blocked from editing. This is the second time you've removed tags which specifically state that you should not remove them. Please stop. Slashme (talk) 19:26, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator intervention requested

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Slashme (talk) 19:38, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself. Tutelary (talk) 19:59, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

B!ttu: I am an administrator here and saw the notice at ANI. You blanked the article about yourself, so I have deleted it. I have also undone some of the redirecting, so that messages intended for you personally now again appear here, where they belong. Do not move a user page into mainspace again; they are different kinds of things. I have also added a template at User:Kang Jun Ho to make it clear to readers that that is a user page, not an article, and have commented out the categories, because user pages are not allowed to be categorized like articles. If you believe you are notable enough to have an article, I suggest you try to create one via Articles for Creation, but first you should carefully read this section of the page on things that Wikipedia is not and the notability standards for models. This summary of the general requirements to have an article may also be helpful; it links to specifics.

In addition, I'm a bit confused as to why you are editing as B!ttu. You were renamed to Kang Jun Ho. Are you currently operating two accounts? Yngvadottir (talk) 20:27, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Kang Jun Ho, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages; user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: Click here to contest this speedy deletion which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy deletion candidate). Doing so will take you to your user talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also edit this page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would help make it encyclopedic. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

Since you twice removed the template identifying it as a user page and not an article, I have nominated User:Kang Jun Ho for speedy deletion as promotion in userspace. Another administrator will now evaluate it. Yngvadottir (talk) 20:45, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at User:Kang_Jun_Ho. Slashme (talk) 22:08, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

B!ttu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i'm a good person i'm not a hacker i'm belongs to a good family i'm a india model

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Kuru (talk) 00:37, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.