User talk:Bajramishpetim

This is Bajramishpetim's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luan Muca (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Luan Muca and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 20:31, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bajramishpetim! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 20:31, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Luan Muça

Hi, I have moved the Luan Muça to Draft:Luan Muça as it's not ready for mainspace. Please submit it to WP:AFC and do not bypass this process by trying to move it to mainspace yourself. See the notice above about it previously being declined for further guidance. -Kj cheetham (talk) 22:27, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thank you for your help. Please help me to do this. I am not trying to bypass any process. How can I add to WP:AFC. Thank you Bajramishpetim (talk) 22:30, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you go to WP:AFC and scroll down to "Submitting for review" it tells you there. But in this particular case it looks like your draft which you moved to User:Luan Muça has already been deleted by an administrator. I suggest asking at WP:TEAHOUSE if you'd like guidance more generally on using Wikipedia, and/or speaking to the deleting admin if you wish to recover the text to work on it further. -Kj cheetham (talk) 22:41, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can I create page again and what to do next please? Just to let wikipedia to review document and then to follow step for next move ?

Thank you veru much for your help. Bajramishpetim (talk) 22:47, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Please stop moving the draft Luan Muça article around. Kj cheetham (talk) 22:30, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I will not remove page. How can I edit page please . How many times need to be accepted name and article. Bajramishpetim (talk) 22:37, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Draft:Luan Muca, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 02:15, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luan Muca (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Luan Muca and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 23:18, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luan Muca (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MarcGarver was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Luan Muca and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MarcGarver (talk) 17:02, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luan Muca (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

If your not interested in reading through the links in the decline messages to understand how to fix the issues listed in them please stop submitting for review this is starting to become a waste of reviewers' time to review a completely unsourced draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Luan Muca and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 21:55, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luan Muca (February 22)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Ingenuity was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: You have repeatedly resubmitted an unsourced draft, wasting reviewers' time, so I am now rejecting it.

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 21:31, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Misuse of WP:RFPP, ignoring feedback on your rejected article

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:17, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok i get that. Solutions ? Bajramishpetim (talk) 15:22, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The solution is to find somewhere else besides Wikipedia to promote the subject. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:23, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already done but still blocked Bajramishpetim (talk) 15:25, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:56, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Luan Muça

Hello, Bajramishpetim. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Luan Muça, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:33, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bajramishpetim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe my block was a misunderstanding and unintentional. I understand and respect Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and am committed to following them. I apologize for any disruption my actions may have caused and request the opportunity to contribute positively to Wikipedia in the future. Bajramishpetim (talk) 17:22, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:30, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, Draft:Luan Muça

Hello, Bajramishpetim. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Luan Muça".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:17, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

Note that I've blocked Bshpet as a suspected sock of this account.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:09, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]