User talk:BangladeshWiki
Blocked again[edit]
Since, after two previous blocks, you have again continued to make bad image uploads – this time on Commons – and inserting these copyright-violating images here on Wikipedia, I have blocked you again. This block is of indefinite duration. You can be unblocked if and when you demonstrate that you have studied and understood our image policies and have thoroughly understood what was wrong with your uploads. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:56, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
BangladeshWiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I Have fully understood the wikipedia image uploading policy and i won't upload any copyright material that vandalize wikipedia copyright policy
Decline reason:
Sorry, but we're going to need a lot more than that. You can't just say you now understand. How is this any different than the last 2 times you were blocked? What specifically was wrong with your previous edits? Could you tell us in your own words, briefly, what the rules are on adding images or text from other sources? Furthermore, if you are unblocked, what contributions will you be making to Wikipedia, since it seems that a large portion of your prior attempts were either copyright violations or contributions of non-notable articles? Qwyrxian (talk) 10:08, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
BangladeshWiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I will not be uplaoding any images from other source and i will add important relaible informations to the notable articles, so please unblock my account and give me another chance to contribute to Wikipedia
Decline reason:
We require adequate answers to the questions asked above by Qwyrxian. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 10:49, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
BangladeshWiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
In order to uplaod images i will need to provide copyright licence and the source must explicitely say that it is ok to use the image
Decline reason:
Procedural decline, please don't open more than one unblock request at a time. Bjelleklang - talk 23:12, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
BangladeshWiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I Promise I Won't Upload And Bad Images Again. I've Understood The Wikipedia Policies. So I Would Kindly Request The Admin to give me one last chance
Decline reason:
You were blocked twice before this last block, and notified about doing it wrong at least once. This should have been a clear hint for you. You didn't change your behavior, and as a result of that I see no reason to trust that you'll conform to the policies this time either. Bjelleklang - talk 23:12, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
BangladeshWiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
What Can I Do To Make Up For My Mistake?
Decline reason:
As this you you fifth unblock request with no significant indication that you understand why you've been blocked, I've removed your ability to edit this page. Kuru (talk) 01:37, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Note[edit]
Note that information regarding Wikipedia's standard offer has been provided via UTRS.--Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 22:12, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Alisha Pradhan[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Alisha Pradhan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 14:01, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
The article Amar Ache Jol has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Found only one independent, reliable source deeper than a TV listing.[2] Other than confirming basic credits (writer/director, cast), its fewer than 150 words say only that the film is based on a novel by the same name, that the director was going to Shamsernagar, Sylhet to scout locations, and that shooting was scheduled from 20 February to 20 March 2008. There isn't enough verifiable information to write an article that goes beyond a concise summary, that treats the film in an encyclopedic manner, discussing its development, design, reception, significance, and influence. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an WP:INDISCRIMINATE clone of IMDb.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Worldbruce (talk) 14:43, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Amar Ache Jol.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Amar Ache Jol.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ChittagongCityCenter.png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:ChittagongCityCenter.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
The article Chaya Chobi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Principal photography began in 2012, but the film has never been released. A few brief, non-independent, press release-based articles exist from when the production was active, but since then nothing has been written about it beyond that it is unreleased. The production itself is not notable, so the film should not be the subject of a standalone article, per WP:NFF.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Worldbruce (talk) 04:43, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ChayaChobi.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:ChayaChobi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:15, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Red Crescent Rupayan Tower for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Crescent Rupayan Tower until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
M.parvage (talk) 10:24, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Red Crescent Rupayan Tower for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Crescent Rupayan Tower (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Worldbruce (talk) 05:22, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of A. K. Khan Tower for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. K. Khan Tower until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.