User talk:Barastert

I have noted that User:Wikipidian is deleting stuff from your contribution. His pattern shows he is a typpical Wahhabi who would not tolerate any Sufi as Muslim or any Sufi concept as Islam. He has a creepy style like User:Itaqallah and I suspect he may be the same person. I advice you put a watch on all articles you contribute to, and check for "legal vandalism" that these people are expert of. Hassanfarooqi 02:36, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tradionalist Islam

Assalamalaikum Barastert,

Just came here to ask if the Traditionalist Islam article if the article should be renamed to tradionalist sunni islam or other variation as User:Striver has voiced concerns over the pov nature of the article title. Also, would I be correct in understanding that the current version of the article represents the views of views of sufis? If so would it be out of order to consider a merge with the sufism article. Thanks. Wikipidian 01:12, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS - by all means check my contributions, hopefully not to creepy for you. Also, User:Itaqallah seems very nice personality to me (though I have had no contact with him) for example he wrote the majority of this article Muhammad as a diplomat, which I like very much - not sure what Hassanfarooqi has against him. Wikipidian 01:12, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

W'Salaam,

No I don't think the article should be renamed. I am not inventing the term. It is an accepted term among scholars in English-speaking academia -- refer to Muhammad Zaman, Souroush, Olivier Roy, Esposito, Metcalf, etc. If I have a chance I'll include the necessary references in the article. There are alot of terms which on the face of it are POV, but it isn't Wikipedia's business to rename accepted terminology. For example, the name Salafi is POV as all Muslims would claim to be followers of the Salaf al Saliheen, so why should only one specific group of Muslims get the monopoly on its usage? But the word has obviously taken on this meaning in the academic world as well as in the media, so it would be wrong for Wikipedians to step in try to rename an accepted term. Get my point?

Wrt Shias, I think there is fair argument, as the traditionist vs fundamentalist divide is present in the Shia world also (though not as prominent), so a section should be added explaining this. However, for the most part when English-speaking academics talk of "traditionalist" Islam, it is usually referring to Sunnis.

Does the article represent the views of the Sufis? No. There are plenty of people who call themselves Sufi who are Sunni, Shia, both or neither. The traditionalist Islam refers to a group of people who primarily consider themselves to be Sunni muslims, but who regard tasawwuf as one of the disciplines of Islamic knowledge. The traditionalist regard the Sharia (as they define it) to be essential, while other groups who call themselves Sufis may not do so. Sufism is just one aspect of traditionalist Islam, and not the defining aspect. --Barastert 16:16, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry I have to disagree and have voted for deletion. The current version of the article resembles very much the views of sufis/barelwi's, therefore content should be moved to those articles. I have also had to correct errors in the article, some of which still remain (for example, you imply that madrassahs, the ijazah system and learning from scholars are a "tradionalist islam" concepts contrary to salafi ideals - again not true). Wikipidian 01:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jali or Jaali?

Thank you for creating the article Jaali. However, I have always believed that Jali is the preferred English spelling. I'd like to suggest that Jali be the main article, and that Jaali redirect to it.

I may be selfish, because, I would wish to have Taj Mahal and Tomb of Imatudalah consistent with the article, and these now use Jali, not Jaali. (In the case of articles where the word appears in a title, such as Sidi Saiyyad Ni Jaali, I think it's perfectly OK to keep the Jaali spelling. In the Taj and Imatudalah articles, where jali is just being used in the text, I would want to use a consistent and preferred spelling.)

In any case, your wikilinks now point half to Jali and half to Jaali. Please pick one or the other (my vote: pick Jali). Then let's dab the links to the other, and correct spelling in articles if necessary.--Nemonoman 23:02, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I have no probs with either one, so go ahead and make the change you want. --Barastert 07:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Phajje_ke_Paye

Hello, I noticed you recreated an article deleted under an AfD. I have deleted it again, please do not recreate it as that decision to delete currently stands. The is a review of the deletion at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2006_December_16#Phajje_ke_Paye, you are welcome to comment there if you think the deletion was unwarranted. Thanks. HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 19:05, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hosay

I removed the info per WP:NOR because Neil SookDeo wrote the book. It may be a secondary source for us, but it's his own research.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 09:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NOR relates to unpublished work, not published work. Guettarda 14:12, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Salam alaykum

Salam Barastert! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing!--Sa.vakilian 03:11, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Cleaning up vandalism Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

I'm happy to meet you and apologize you because other wikipedians should have put this "welcome" in your talk page sooner.I invite to participate in Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam.--Sa.vakilian 03:11, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Shaykh Nazim al-Qubrusi

An article that you have been involved in editing, Shaykh Nazim al-Qubrusi, has been listed by me for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaykh Nazim al-Qubrusi (2nd nomination). Thank you. -N 07:44, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Barastert (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Barastert (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Sadiqahmad122". The reason given for Sadiqahmad122's block is: "Clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia".

Blocking administrator: Drmies (talk • blocks)

Accept reason: Autoblock lifted. Please let us know if there are any other problems. Max Semenik (talk) 12:04, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Barastert. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Sufism

Portal:Sufism, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Sufism and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Sufism during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 08:37, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bedam Shah Warsi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bedam Shah Warsi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jdcomix (talk) 15:03, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bedam Shah Warsi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bedam Shah Warsi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 16:39, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bedam Shah Warsi (August 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Maliner was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bedam Shah Warsi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Maliner (talk) 17:33, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Barastert! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Maliner (talk) 17:33, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]